LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Originally posted by Deepu Sudhakar One again....the current 2.6 kernel is test4. It's showing test3 now.
Not to sound rude or anything, the kernel and its latest releases can change almost on a daily basis. Jeremy is a busy person working a full time job and also maintaining this great site. Is it really that important to keep bugging about the latest kernel block on the homepage and what release they are on? Just a thought....
Maybe the kernel team should write a script or something for others to use to autoupdate from... so we wouldn't have to bug jeremy for some of these tedious updates....
Originally posted by trickykid Not to sound rude or anything, the kernel and its latest releases can change almost on a daily basis. Jeremy is a busy person working a full time job and also maintaining this great site. Is it really that important to keep bugging about the latest kernel block on the homepage and what release they are on? Just a thought....
Maybe the kernel team should write a script or something for others to use to autoupdate from... so we wouldn't have to bug jeremy for some of these tedious updates....
I understand, and I, honestly, don't have any problem with the script. Honestly, I don't get my kernel updates from linuxquestions.org...I look to kernel.org for that.
So why do I keep "bugging" about it? Just to alert him that there is a problem. I could care less if it is fixed or not. What makes this worth bugging about is that it is supposed to be autoupdated through a script. He doesn't change it manually...that means there is a problem with the script itself.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
