LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-16-2005, 10:06 AM   #16
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 12,463

Rep: Reputation: 3340Reputation: 3340Reputation: 3340Reputation: 3340Reputation: 3340Reputation: 3340Reputation: 3340Reputation: 3340Reputation: 3340Reputation: 3340Reputation: 3340

If a user replies to their own thread, it does indeed pull it off the 0 replies list.

--jeremy
 
Old 12-16-2005, 02:05 PM   #17
david_ross
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Scotland
Distribution: Slackware, RedHat, Debian
Posts: 12,047

Rep: Reputation: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by minrich
[Incidentally: A QUESTION for jeremy or the Mods: If the original poser of a question adds a second post (rather than editing the original post) is this recognized by the current software as a reply, or does the thread remain as a '0 reply' looking for an answer?]
This will remove it from the 0 reply since it quite litteraly searches for threads with 0 replies, doing otherwise would be quite resource intensive.

In the past people used to bump their threads which removed it from the 0 reply list with a post of "bump" which appart from being annoying also removed it from the 0 reply list. The autobump feature for 0 replies seems to work a lot better in this regard.

I have a feeling that a reminder e-mail was suggested a while ago and jeremy spoke about puting it on the todo list but I don't think it was progressed any further. I've got to say that I still quite like the idea though.
 
Old 12-16-2005, 03:12 PM   #18
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 472Reputation: 472Reputation: 472Reputation: 472Reputation: 472
Quote:
From How To Ask A Question
What To Do When Your Question is Answered
Tell us. Tell us what worked for you. Someone coming along after you with an identical problem needs to know if the fixes work. And, just as importantly, the people who have spent their free time helping you would like to know that you have now solved the problem. Please don't just vanish or walk away without saying Thanks.

Even better, find a place in the LQ Wiki to describe what was done to get it working properly first time. Not only will you help others, but your solution will be saved for posterity.
I like the idea of an email or pop up being sent to the thread starter to say "did any of the suggestions in your thread work? Please post and let us know", a number of posters register only to post one question and we never see them again. So they don't see the pop up on logging in and they are likely to either ignore the email or abandon their email address.

Part of the problem is that LQ is just too nice. Seriously. If we had set ourselves up as a 'hardass' forum from the beginning (as some have done) we would have a) more completion posts and b) a lot less members.

We can only encourage people by example, we can't force them. Unfortunately
 
Old 12-16-2005, 03:59 PM   #19
simcox1
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 794
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 30
Yes but the more popular a forum is the more chance of finding the answer. At least it's busy. Also, it doesn't matter how many ways you can think of getting people to post back, or use netiquette, or whatever, it's probably not going to work. You just have to rely on people working it out for themselves.
 
Old 12-16-2005, 05:39 PM   #20
linmix
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Spain
Distribution: FC5
Posts: 1,993
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 46
I've followed this thread with great interest as it was something I'd been thinking about for some time. Along the same line I have another related question/suggestion:

Would it be good to have an option somewhere to indicate a question has been adequately answered. I ask this, because as long a a question has 0 replies, you know where you stand. If it has 1 reply and the author didn't write the last one, either he didn't see it yet, or never bothered to post back with a 'thank you' message, but if there are 3 (or 4,5,6,7,8...) posts, it is impossible to know if more help is needed.

If a user could indicate his question was answered and this could be seen from the forum, without actually opening the thread, this might help to see which posts still need additional imput.
 
Old 12-16-2005, 06:00 PM   #21
ctkroeker
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Paraguay
Posts: 1,565
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 50
My thoughts exactly, linmix.
This would be helpful and save a lot of time.
 
Old 12-16-2005, 06:20 PM   #22
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 472Reputation: 472Reputation: 472Reputation: 472Reputation: 472
Ah, this one again. We have had very long discussions on this very matter. Basically, the result of it was a sort of agreement that if a poster can't even be bothered to come back to say "thanks, <solution> worked", they are also unlikely to come back and tick a box.

What I would suggest (and like anything, it's not perfect and may not work) is that if you as a reader find a solution in the thread, rate the thread. Maybe, if we get a bunch of highly rated threads then it will be obvious that those threads work.

Not perfect, but as good as any other.
 
Old 12-16-2005, 06:42 PM   #23
titanium_geek
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Location: Melbourne Australia
Distribution: it died/ macosx
Posts: 2,478

Rep: Reputation: 50
I think that the rating thread thing is under exposed, perhaps we need to have a push to rate threads - like the successful push to answer zero replies.

Awesome answer to a question? rate the thread!

titanium_geek
 
Old 12-16-2005, 07:11 PM   #24
minrich
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Isles of Man & Wight
Distribution: See signature
Posts: 548

Rep: Reputation: 40
Okay, so I just rated this thread: Excellent

Since I am the only voter so far it really stands out on the Website Suggestions & Feedback Forum!
 
Old 12-16-2005, 07:27 PM   #25
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 472Reputation: 472Reputation: 472Reputation: 472Reputation: 472
There you go - asked, answered and rated.
 
Old 12-17-2005, 04:38 AM   #26
linmix
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Spain
Distribution: FC5
Posts: 1,993
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 46
I see the difficulty... I agrree that rating should be promoted... I'd never thought about it, let alone done it!
 
Old 12-17-2005, 06:45 AM   #27
ctkroeker
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Paraguay
Posts: 1,565
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 50
I guess it doesn't happen very often that someone rates a thread...
 
Old 12-17-2005, 08:55 AM   #28
arunvk
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: India
Distribution: Fedora 11
Posts: 196

Rep: Reputation: 30
i totally agree. people should atleast have the courtesy of giving a feedback on the solution given to them.
 
Old 12-17-2005, 09:19 AM   #29
linmix
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Spain
Distribution: FC5
Posts: 1,993
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 46
There's another snag though. It's not easy to rate a thread as good if the sollution given is a good link t another thread that gives a complete explanation. The thread rating would be given to the second one, not to the first. Anyway, after reading all your arguments I guess it's all good as it'll get.
 
Old 12-17-2005, 01:39 PM   #30
TruongAn
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Vietnam (Việt Nam)
Distribution: Gentoo (desktop), Arch linux (laptop)
Posts: 728

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 33
I think rate is not enough.
Rate the thread does not mean thanks to those who suggest solution
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Using Firestarter ... Can I Add/Drop rules from a terminal prompt? rickh Linux - Security 1 06-15-2005 04:21 AM
IPTABLES how to add/edit/delete rules in existing chain? debug019 Linux - Newbie 1 11-11-2004 03:48 PM
kdevelop add folder and add new class is slow edwardt Programming 0 03-03-2004 07:04 PM
Miss Match IP Add and Adapter Add. ???? hitesh_linux Linux - Networking 5 02-08-2003 02:34 PM
Viruses, ipchains, dynamic rules, rules with regular expressions marktaff Linux - Security 2 09-25-2001 05:01 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration