LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am a newbie here and composed a long detailed post requesting help and just lost it because a URL was in it.
Please warn people that this will happen I will try to recompose my questions and re-post later when I have time
Moved: This thread is more suitable in Website Suggestions&Feedback, and has been moved accordingly to help your thread/question get the exposure it deserves.
hiya SPACE_OG- Welcome to LQ!
I'm sorry that happened- but the move is there to stop spammers- those who just sign up and post a link. you need 5 posts before you can post a link- blantant advertisment of this fact would make it null. this isn't really a hurdle for legitimate users- you should get 5+ posts in no time- (not that you should post crap to bump your post count)
You should always copy really long posts so it remains in you're computer's memory- even pasting it to a text document helps.
jeremy- this hasn't happened to me, so I dunno- is there an option where they can go back and remove the link?
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
There should have been a large red warning with the following at the top of the new post page:
"Sorry, in order to post a URL you must have at least 5 posts. This measure was put into place to prevent spamming. Please remove the URL and try again. Posting extra threads to get around this rule will result in all threads being removed."
To titanium and jeremy, Thanks for the concerned replies. Yes the read notice was there but it could make the user aware that the text is lost in that case as well.
Also yes I tried to go "back" but the text was lost.
What browser do you use? I never have any problems clicking back when I get errors on online forms and text areas, not losing anything I've just typed. I use Firefox and Opera 99.999% of the time.
Browsers have different ways of functioning though, LQ tries to make the rules clear and what might happen and can't be responsible if your browser stores the info from a prevoius page or not.
Originally posted by abcdefg Firefox looses everything 100% of the time at every forum I visit when I hit the back button. Maybe its something to do with the way my settings are?
Doesn't happen with my version 1.0.7 on Slackware. Actually, never happens on any version I used from what I remember.
Why not go around this problem with cache by providing a textarea along with the warning that contains the submitted text? That way you do not need to go back, just edit the text and re-press submit.
Originally posted by Tinkster Why build code to circumvent a lack of training?
Why not? Those people will most certainly not learn anything just because we do not build this code, so why not get rid of those complains so we can keep focus on more important stuff? I see no harm in building code to prevent loss of text. People can forget to copy the text before submitting, maybe his/her browser does not save the text and I do not think that we will encurage people to be lazy just because of this extra code. It will not make us more Microsoftish, IMHO, just nicer to people who have just registered at LQ.
Originally posted by Tinkster Why build code to circumvent a lack of training?
Or lack of reading, or lack of following the rules, or expecting to be spoon-fed answers when clicking on the search link above would get the answer right away. . .
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.