LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Actually, I just woke up and saw the mess in the forums that I co-moderate. I cleaned up the mess, unSpawn beat me to it and has already banned kellypink.
Currently there are 18 (+ Jeremy) mods from all around the world, but there is no 24/7 coverage. Moderators only have the rights to take actions like deleting threads only in their specific sub-fora.
I think it would be possible to get to a 24/7 coverage, if someone would step up and pay those 18 people for a full-time job.
But it's been more than 15 minutes that I see that. Are they sleeping?
Good grief! Give the mods a break, please. Even if the mods were paid for doing this as a full time job, there would be times when this would happen (ie, some 'member' would chose to spam the site....happens all the time, because the world has a more than adequate supply of ********s). It would then take the mods a while to get the message and a little more time to get things cleaned up. They don't just think it and it happens automagically.
That said, you should also bear in mind how much sense (or otherwise) this thread will make once the mods have cleaned up this particularly egregious outbreak of list spamming. Once kellypink and his/her/its posts have gone, will people be able to understand what you have written? I could, because I also saw kellypink's 'contributions' via rss, but this thread will be a mystery to those who have no idea of kellypink and what/why was going on.
The correct thing to do is just use the 'report' function and let the mods get to it when they can. That doesn't create any incomprehensible threads, and it doesn't create unnecessary traffic. Obviously, if something that looks like spam has been reported and is still there, say, 24 hours later, perhaps an additional report might be necessary, but, out of all the reports I have made, I can't currently remember one of those...
But it's been more than 15 minutes that I see that. Are they sleeping?
At the time of your writing it was 5.30 AM here and I were on the High Road at a 130 km/h speed!
I join the chorus to assure you that that at least 4 moderators (me included) have taken care of this spam spreading and applied counter-measures as permitted by their admin privileges. Moreover one of the team members asked the LQ administrator to perform a massive clean-up of the damage caused by this malicious activity. Considering the differences in time zones I think the issue has been dealt with promptly, hasn't it?
Give moderators power to handle all forums. I see no practical benefit in splitting up duties. As issues like this affect the entire forum, rather than specific subforums, it may be more practical to allow moderators powers in all subforums.
From a personal point of view, things are fine as they are. Due to the huge amount of new questions and new answers posted every day, I think we work better by managing only a limited set of forums and acting as a team. I can tell you that the LQ Moderators mailing list is very active (you can think at it as a forum with many many hits every day).
Quote:
Originally Posted by vharishankar
I have been an admin/supermod at a fairly busy forum and spam cleanup is easier if a single moderator is allowed to deal with all of a spam user's posts.
Actually all the members of the mods team have the power to ban spammers at any time with no retrictions. Only the deletion of the spammed threads requires privileges to manage that specific forum, since it means deleting a record from the LQ database.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.