LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-13-2002, 08:02 AM   #1
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1977Reputation: 1977Reputation: 1977Reputation: 1977Reputation: 1977Reputation: 1977Reputation: 1977Reputation: 1977Reputation: 1977Reputation: 1977Reputation: 1977
autoreplacing abrvs?


Sadly, i'm seriously suggesting the auto replacement of "words" like plz and thnx with please and thanks. Anyone else want to admit to being as petty as me by saying they find it really annoying too?

thx
 
Old 10-13-2002, 08:16 AM   #2
GT I.N.C
Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Location: Australia, Sydney, St.Clair
Distribution: Rh 7.3
Posts: 836

Rep: Reputation: 30
hmmmm i chat alot to my friends and i get use to talking like that..but while on forums i try to stop my self..but sumtimez i may hav the certain slip up it would be a good idea....nice suggestion...

Garry
 
Old 10-13-2002, 11:01 AM   #3
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 252Reputation: 252Reputation: 252
It doesn't really bother me until I see it in the thread title but wouldn't be a bad idea. I'm all for it.
 
Old 10-13-2002, 03:01 PM   #4
MasterC
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu
Posts: 12,612

Rep: Reputation: 68
I don't like the idea...

I don't think it compares to things like h4x0r and other completely unreadable words. It's not over used, and it even adds a bit of character to the thread. If everything was written the same, then there wouldn't be any feeling in the thread, and it would read as if a computer generated the text rather than a person with a situation.

Plz and thx are pretty obvious as to what they mean, and wouldn't detract from the overall question posed. And even if they are posted as Please and Thanks, it wouldn't make the person's question more vaild. Off the top of my head I can't think of any others right now.

But I do think it's the same as IMO, TIA, BTW, and other acronyms that are commonly used here, and I don't think that those should be altered either.

So I don't think it should be changed, IMO .

Cool
 
Old 10-14-2002, 12:10 AM   #5
neo77777
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Distribution: *NIX
Posts: 3,704

Rep: Reputation: 56
I think we were through this some time earlier with this member with l33t pattern in his user name. Obviously I wasn't alone having hard times to understand what the guy was talking about, so plz and thx don't look that horrible comparing to talks originating from *l33t* person
 
Old 10-14-2002, 07:12 AM   #6
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,394
Blog Entries: 55

Rep: Reputation: 3565Reputation: 3565Reputation: 3565Reputation: 3565Reputation: 3565Reputation: 3565Reputation: 3565Reputation: 3565Reputation: 3565Reputation: 3565Reputation: 3565
FWIW it annoys me somewhat more if ppl write as if slurring words together in some obscure dialect. But if ppl persist in crypting their questions and replies, well then I just won't bother trying to uncrypt em and grab the next readable question. It's *their* problem , not mine if they don't sense these fora ain't about stance but about information. Either way it's not enforcable me thinks.

If you use a proxy like Privoxy simple regexes can expand text untill it becomes readable/more fscked.
s|(<td.*>)microsoft<.*/td>|$1fsckin bast's outta Redmond bearing gifts that poison your precious lil box$3|sigU
s|(<td.*>)root<.*/td>|$1a person bereft of knowledge or information on the topic at hand succumbing to doing things the wrong way$3|sigU
s|(<td.*>)slackware<.*/td>|$1sl4ckwh0r3$3|sigU
Watch out it won't expand replies as well tho :-]
 
Old 10-14-2002, 09:21 AM   #7
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 12,787

Rep: Reputation: 3579Reputation: 3579Reputation: 3579Reputation: 3579Reputation: 3579Reputation: 3579Reputation: 3579Reputation: 3579Reputation: 3579Reputation: 3579Reputation: 3579
Chris,
While I like the idea, after the earlier problems we encountered with autoreplace I think it is better left unimplemented.

--jeremy
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration