LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
03-08-2007, 09:05 AM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Olympia, WA, USA
Distribution: Fedora, (K)Ubuntu
Posts: 4,187
|
Apply "Advanced Search" options to "My LQ" searches
It would be a “nice to have” if the “My LQ” searches would apply the options specified in under “Advanced Search” to the implied searches attached to the various “My” items.
Specifically, the “My Posts” item ignores the “Present results as threads” setting.
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 11:46 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: California
Distribution: Fedora , CentOS , RHEL
Posts: 1,979
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTrenholme
It would be a “nice to have” if the “My LQ” searches would apply the options specified in under “Advanced Search” to the implied searches attached to the various “My” items.
Specifically, the “My Posts” item ignores the “Present results as threads” setting.
|
Good idea! I HATE it when somone replies with "Use the search"...but yet the search finds nothing relevant...an Advanced Search would be a great way for somone to find exactly what they are looking for...
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 12:06 PM
|
#3
|
Moderator
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
|
Instead of clicking "My Posts", why don't you click "My Threads"? Of course, both of these searches will only bring up your own posts and threads as that is what they are designed for.
The normal Search function, and there are advanced functions in there, is probably what you are both after.
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 12:18 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250
Rep:
|
LQ's advanced search function works pretty good, but if you need multiple search terms, it can be a bit flaky.
In those cases do a regular google search like this:
Quote:
<search terms> site:linuxquestions.org
|
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 01:06 PM
|
#5
|
Moderator
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Scotland
Distribution: Slackware, RedHat, Debian
Posts: 12,047
Rep:
|
If you select "My Posts" then you will obviously get the results as posts. If you want a list of threads you have posted in then simply put your user name in the "Search by username" box and ensure that the "show results as threads" box is checked.
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 02:27 PM
|
#6
|
root 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,618
|
david_ross is correct. The "My Posts" link is a specific bit of functionality that should ignore the "results as threads” setting.
--jeremy
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 03:57 PM
|
#7
|
Moderator
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
|
Dagnabbit - that's what I said. And I was first!! 
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 06:56 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Olympia, WA, USA
Distribution: Fedora, (K)Ubuntu
Posts: 4,187
Original Poster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by XavierP
Instead of clicking “My Posts”, why don’t you click “My Threads”? Of course, both of these searches will only bring up your own posts and threads as that is what they are designed for.
The normal Search function, and there are advanced functions in there, is probably what you are both after.
|
Well, that would work if I wanted to see my threads, but what I’d like to see is my posts presented as the threads to which the post was made. I can get the desired result by going to “Advanced Search” and searching for my user id since I opted for search results to be presented by thread.
What I was suggesting was only that the “My Posts” search should honor the presentation option selected in the “Advanced Search” page.
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 07:02 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Olympia, WA, USA
Distribution: Fedora, (K)Ubuntu
Posts: 4,187
Original Poster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy
david_ross is correct. The “My Posts” link is a specific bit of functionality that should ignore the "results as threads” setting.
—jeremy
|
And why is that, Jeremy? It sounds like you deliberately chose to ignore the option, so, if it was deliberate, could you tell us what the reasoning was? Obviously, since my desired result can be achieved by using the search function, the implementation can’t be too hard.
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 07:05 PM
|
#10
|
root 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,618
|
Ray, my apologizes - you're correct
PTrenholme, that functionality is built into the boards, it wasn't a design decision by us.
--jeremy
|
|
|
03-08-2007, 07:31 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Olympia, WA, USA
Distribution: Fedora, (K)Ubuntu
Posts: 4,187
Original Poster
|
OK, I'll just set up a Firefox macro to do the search for me. But it would still be a "nice to have," so why not pass the suggestion on to the board maintainers?
|
|
|
03-09-2007, 02:08 AM
|
#12
|
Moderator
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
|
Since both of the board maintainers have been in this thread, they know about your suggestion now  What you are after is a feature request reporting mechanism, I think.
|
|
|
03-09-2007, 08:04 AM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Olympia, WA, USA
Distribution: Fedora, (K)Ubuntu
Posts: 4,187
Original Poster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by XavierP
|
I think you may have misunderstood my comment. I was noting that Jeremy said that the “My Posts” item was a feature of the board suppliers, from which I, reasonably, I think, concluded that the whole site was using someone’s “board” software. I, therefore, suggested that Jeremy contact the suppliers of that software.
Your reply, if you did correctly understand my suggestion, implies that the moderators are also the software maintainers. If that’s the case, then, yes, a “New features” sub-forum might be appropriate.
|
|
|
03-09-2007, 08:54 AM
|
#14
|
root 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,618
|
While we use a standard system for some parts of the site, we have heavily customized it and are always willing to add features based on demand.
--jeremy
|
|
|
03-09-2007, 09:19 AM
|
#15
|
Moderator
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTrenholme
I think you may have misunderstood my comment. I was noting that Jeremy said that the “My Posts” item was a feature of the board suppliers, from which I, reasonably, I think, concluded that the whole site was using someone’s “board” software. I, therefore, suggested that Jeremy contact the suppliers of that software.
Your reply, if you did correctly understand my suggestion, implies that the moderators are also the software maintainers. If that’s the case, then, yes, a “New features” sub-forum might be appropriate.
|
Jeremy and David_Ross tend to do any work on the software. My response was a bit tongue in cheek, if you follow the link to the bug reporting pages, you will se that you can click the drop down to change it to feature request.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|