a request that LQ review the status of the LQ puppy support sub-forum
in the spirit of LQ policy in regards to supporting a sub -forum
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd also like to note that at www.puppylinux.com ,under forums, LQ is still prominently listed. Quote:
|
Quote:
:hattip: Quote:
:hattip: |
Could someone please explain the Puppy forum drama that keeps spilling over to LQ?
|
Quote:
There is one member named puppyite that actually is agitating as you could probably see here : Puppy Linux Forum / Help Documents / Main Mission Statement and Rules (rev4 - 12/4/2011) http://www.puppylinuxforum.org/misc....ion=help&hid=8 ONE point there reads as this : Quote:
This thread now was started in the Puppy section of LQ , and though the OP seems to be interested in technical questions (s)he seems to try to do some 4-14 years old bored child kidding (again) . I was wondering who linked this unnecessary thread here . I really had thought the warnings against puppyite and the OP had calmed down everything . I would not call it a drama , but slightly disgusting "sprayers vandalism/romanism" .:scratch: |
Oh, I see. Some people weren't happy about how one forum was managed, so they started another forum. Makes perfect sense now.
|
jonyo,
You've been asked nicely to stop behavior like this multiple times now. I'm going to revoke your posting privileges for three days. Another transgression will result in a significantly longer ban. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me directly. --jeremy |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 PM. |