Hello. Necessity is a Mother. I come bearing QUESTIONS!!!
LinuxQuestions.org Member IntroNew to LinuxQuestions.org? Been a long time member but never made a post? Introduce yourself here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hello. Necessity is a Mother. I come bearing QUESTIONS!!!
Hi everyone.
I've been playing around with PCs since about 1985, first on an Apple IIe, typing in Applesoft BASIC programs from Nibble Magazine and then debugging them.
I put together a Seagate 64MB SCSI hard drive and mated it to my IIe, to the amazement of my fellow usergroup members. It cost about $750 for the hardware and lasted about 10 years. Later I added a 1 Mb RAM card and replaced the 1 MHz 65C02 processor with a 4 MHz Rocket Chip.
After a few years. I got a IIgs, and then broke into the PC world around 1989, when I learned to administer a dBase II+ database application at work.
I got my first Intel desktop in 1991. I've learned a lot, and in recent years dabbled with dual boot M$/Linux machines.
I've put together a new PC (my second) that has an AMD Athlon 64 processor, and I'm jumping into the world of 64 bit computing.
This machine is dual boot WinXP 64/Debian Etch 4.0 amd64
I am a Second Life user and I found much to my dismay that I can't run the SL client on XP 64. I tried downloading the Linux Alpha client, but I'm having problems getting it to work.
I've downloaded the proprietary ATI drivers for my RADEON HD 2600 Pro PCI-e video card, but I still can't get the SL client to run under Debian.
That is what brings me here. I hope some of you will be willing to help me learn what I need to know about this.
Oh, and I'd like to be able to MOUNT my NTFS data partition so I can access all my files and digital images in Debian.
I'll be posting on what I hope are the correct forums about these two issues.
mounting ntfs just for reading in Linux is quite easy
su to root
Code:
username@machine: ~$ su
Password: enter root password although nothing shows up
machine: /home/username# mkdir /mnt/windows
machine: /home/username# mount -t ntfs /dev/hdxx /mnt/windows
machine: /home/username# cd /mnt/windows
machine: /mnt/windows# ls
CONFIG.SYS MSDOS.SYS ntldr Program Files System Volume Information WINDOWS
AUTOEXEC.BAT Inetpub MSOCache NVIDIA temp boot.ini
Documents and Settings IO.SYS NTDETECT.COM pagefile.sys RECYCLER
In an attempt to not post duplicate questions I find myself piggy-backing on this question posted bydkathrens77.
I've just dual-booted my ASUS A7K notebook with Vista (default OS) and SuSE 10.3. Everything installed OK and I'm getting a desktop and the auto install added my ntfs partition to the fstab so I have access to all my windows files.
Note to the post on how to mount ntfs partition by leonscape. When I did this under root then only root could access the mounted resource and haven't found an answer to this issue but to add to fstab. But I digress.
Running the AMD Turion 64x2 with a Radeon HD 2600 video card and the Realtek HD audio card built in.
Going to AMD's web site I downloaded the ati-driver-installer-8-3-x86.x86_64.run file who's instructions say to su- then cd to containing folder and enter "ati-driver-installer-8-3-x86.x86_64.run" (as I interpreted their instructions) however SuSE comes back saying that run command is not found.
I'm hoping that someone can help clear up this issue for us.
You might want to also give your Linux read/write capability on that NTFS drive. To do that, install ntfs-3g and ntfs-config. I guess you'll use something like apt to get it, as yumex may now work for you.
Anyway, the line in your file system table (/etc/fstab) should look something like this:
/dev/sdd1 /mnt/MyNTFSPartition ntfs-3g noauto,rw,users,async,force,locale=en_US.UTF-8 0 0
And I started computing on a Rockwell AIM 65 in 1978, and I did dBaseIII+, so there
And I started computing on a Rockwell AIM 65 in 1978, and I did dBaseIII+, so there
Many thanks kind sir. I found that the issues were pertaining to that ability to r/w permissions on ntfs partitions. After downloading the file under my Linux profile I was able to install the file however this still didn't resolve the issue as the 3-D still failed and the 1440 x 900 resolution didn't take either.
I started computing on a Commodore 64 typing in the code from the Computing magazine.
I don't know what to tell you about the ATI video drivers. I do know that the ATI drivers from the Livna repository are much better than from ATI, but Linva is apparently for my Fedora.
The NTFS-3g driver allows RW access to your drive. The fstab line that I provided allows it to be mounted by the user, not just root.
My first venture into the Comodore arena was with a VIC 20. It had 5K of RAM onboard. My AIM had 1 K when I bought it, but was expandable to 4K on board. I later upgraded it to 32K by wire wrapping a memory expansion daughter board.
I wrote a 6502 Assembly program to read data from 16 transducers on a dynamometer as a racing engine was slowly reved up across its test range, and tabulate and graph the result.
Someone asked me if I thought the new IBM PC would be capable of such a thing, and I said no, of course not. Its just not fast enough. Hey, it may have had 10 times my 64K of RAM, but I had the faster processor, even at only 2 mHz. The 65C02 was much more efficient, and had a pipeline architecture, prefetching instructions, and allowed operation on both the rising and falling edges of the clock. The longest instruction only took 6 clock cycles.
Matter of a fact, due to the high level of emf coming off the multi-spark ignitions, I had to wait until a plug fired, then take all 16 reading and get out before the next plug fired. That was 1983 technology, and no, I still don't think an IBM XT could have done it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.