LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking > Linux - Wireless Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Wireless Networking This forum is for the discussion of wireless networking in Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-08-2007, 02:35 PM   #16
ENDI1111
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 93

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15

[root@localhost ~]# tail /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist
blacklist sstfb
blacklist neofb
blacklist tridentfb
blacklist tdfxfb
blacklist virgefb
blacklist vga16fb

# ISDN - see bugs 154799, 159068
blacklist hisax
blacklist hisax_fcpcipnp
[root@localhost ~]#
What else should I be doing...Anything to edit? Am I using the right firmware? It just seems like I am almost there.

[root@localhost ~]# ls /lib/firmware
b43 ipw-2.4-boot.fw iwlwifi-3945-1.ucode
ipw2100-1.3.fw ipw-2.4-bss.fw iwlwifi-3945.ucode
ipw2100-1.3-i.fw ipw-2.4-bss_ucode.fw LICENSE.ipw2100
ipw2100-1.3-p.fw ipw-2.4-ibss.fw LICENSE.ipw2200
ipw2200-bss.fw ipw-2.4-ibss_ucode.fw zd1211
ipw2200-ibss.fw ipw-2.4-sniffer.fw
ipw2200-sniffer.fw ipw-2.4-sniffer_ucode.fw
[root@localhost ~]#

Ok...this is what I am getting when I execute these last two commands you posted PTrenholme.

Last edited by ENDI1111; 10-08-2007 at 02:37 PM.
 
Old 10-08-2007, 02:40 PM   #17
ENDI1111
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 93

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by ENDI1111 View Post
[root@localhost ~]# b43-fwcutter -l
b43-fwcutter version 008

Extracting firmware is possible from these binary driver files:

<driver> <filename> <microcode> <MD5 checksum>

b43legacy wl_apsta.o 295.14 e08665c5c5b66beb9c3b2dd54aa80cb3
b43 wl_apsta.o 351.126 9207bc565c2fc9fa1591f6c7911d3fc0
b43 wl_apsta_mimo.o 351.126 722e2e0d8cc04b8f118bb5afe6829ff9
b43 wl_ap.o 410.2160 1e4763b4cb8cfbaae43e5c6d3d6b2ae7

[root@localhost ~]#
Are there any of these that I should blacklist or remove. Or are they all fine. Also should I delete that wlan0 profile in my Network-Config...or will it reconfigure when I reboot my system.
 
Old 10-08-2007, 04:33 PM   #18
2Gnu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Southern California
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,880

Rep: Reputation: 51
Blacklist ndiswrapper or completely remove it if you're going to use bm43. It's not in the list of things you posted.

The only firmware you have in the place bm43 is going to look is for an Intel card. Copy the firmware files you extracted earlier to /lib/firmware.
 
Old 10-08-2007, 05:27 PM   #19
Hangdog42
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,803
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422
One thing to keep in mind is that you need to extract firmware from a different file for b43 than for bcm43xx or b43legacy. Read this for details.
 
Old 10-08-2007, 09:09 PM   #20
ENDI1111
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 93

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Gnu View Post
Blacklist ndiswrapper or completely remove it if you're going to use bm43. It's not in the list of things you posted.

The only firmware you have in the place bm43 is going to look is for an Intel card. Copy the firmware files you extracted earlier to /lib/firmware.
I did completely remove ndiswrapper. Now I cut the firmware...How can I copy the driver files to /lib/firmware. Where are they located. You can look at one of my previous postings. I did a bcm43-fwcutter -l...and it showed me some files. Where are they located.

b43legacy wl_apsta.o 295.14 e08665c5c5b66beb9c3b2dd54aa80cb3
b43 wl_apsta.o 351.126 9207bc565c2fc9fa1591f6c7911d3fc0
b43 wl_apsta_mimo.o 351.126 722e2e0d8cc04b8f118bb5afe6829ff9
b43 wl_ap.o 410.2160 1e4763b4cb8cfbaae43e5c6d3d6b2ae7

These one's here. Remember I cut the firmware: b43-fwcutter -w /lib/firmware /tmp/broadcom-wl-4.80.53.0/kmod/wl_apsta.o
/tmp/b43-fwcutter-008 -->>this is where the b43 file is.
/lib/firmware/b43 -->> this is in my /lib/firmware directory.

Last edited by ENDI1111; 10-08-2007 at 09:18 PM.
 
Old 10-08-2007, 10:09 PM   #21
2Gnu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Southern California
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,880

Rep: Reputation: 51
When you said this:

"ndiswrapper device wlan0 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization."

It sounded like NDISwrapper was still installed & loading. You uninstalled after that?

Looking again at your output from ls /lib/firmware, looks like the firmware cutter created a b43 directory. It was munged onto the same line as one of the Intel f/w files, so I missed it. Hopefully, /lib/firmware/b43 is the proper location.

There is precious little info out there on bm43. I've been reading the Fedora dev lists and frankly the whole thing looks like a high school science project. Wish I could help more, but the best advice I could give is to steer clear of FC.
 
Old 10-08-2007, 10:31 PM   #22
ENDI1111
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 93

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Gnu View Post
When you said this:

"ndiswrapper device wlan0 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization."

It sounded like NDISwrapper was still installed & loading. You uninstalled after that?

Looking again at your output from ls /lib/firmware, looks like the firmware cutter created a b43 directory. It was munged onto the same line as one of the Intel f/w files, so I missed it. Hopefully, /lib/firmware/b43 is the proper location.

There is precious little info out there on bm43. I've been reading the Fedora dev lists and frankly the whole thing looks like a high school science project. Wish I could help more, but the best advice I could give is to steer clear of FC.
Ya I did uninstall after that. I went through everything to make sure there was no ndiswrapper anywhere on my system. I need to know if I should erase that device in network-config. Or just leave it alone. I turned off the option to load it on boot? Go or no go on that? I also created ifcfg wlan0 in network scripts and in networking. Is this necessary...or should I remove them?
Yeah FC really does seem like a HS science project. It's been a helluva a deal to get things going. I haven't been able to get my wireless up at all. Plus I am learning all of this Linux as I go, with a couple of books from the library as reference. GoogleLand is OK...It is really a handful of mixed results.
 
Old 10-08-2007, 10:34 PM   #23
ENDI1111
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 93

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Gnu View Post
When you said this:

"ndiswrapper device wlan0 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization."

It sounded like NDISwrapper was still installed & loading. You uninstalled after that?

Looking again at your output from ls /lib/firmware, looks like the firmware cutter created a b43 directory. It was munged onto the same line as one of the Intel f/w files, so I missed it. Hopefully, /lib/firmware/b43 is the proper location.

There is precious little info out there on bm43. I've been reading the Fedora dev lists and frankly the whole thing looks like a high school science project. Wish I could help more, but the best advice I could give is to steer clear of FC.
How is the Slackware...? I am really just trying to find a good distro to keep on my HP laptop. I have a number of other distro's on RW.
 
Old 10-08-2007, 10:39 PM   #24
ENDI1111
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 93

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I just noticed that I untared a b43-fwcutter-008, and the linux wireless website does not have the 008 attached to it. Does this make any of a difference at all?
 
Old 10-08-2007, 11:42 PM   #25
2Gnu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Southern California
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,880

Rep: Reputation: 51
Slackware is the best. I started on Mandrake, moved to SuSE, then Red Hat, tried Linspire, Debian, Ubuntu (have that loaded on a spare laptop for testing). Slack just feels right. I have it running on four PCs (two laptops with wireless) and my sons use it on their machines. It's not everyone's cup of tea.

The 008 on the end of the file (b43-fwcutter-008) is probably your browser appending the download with a number to denote multiples of the same file name.
 
Old 10-08-2007, 11:43 PM   #26
Bruce Hill
HCL Maintainer
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: McCalla, AL, USA
Distribution: Arch, Gentoo
Posts: 6,940

Rep: Reputation: 129Reputation: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Gnu View Post
I've been reading the Fedora dev lists and frankly the whole thing looks like a high school science project. Wish I could help more, but the best advice I could give is to steer clear of FC.
Do you mean that Fedora Core is not a high school science project?

We thought it was the fork when RedHat announced officially in 2004 that it couldn't produce a reliable desktop Linux OS.


ENDI1111,

Slackware is the oldest surviving Linux distribution. Quoting from What is Slackware Linux?:
Quote:
Since its first release in April of 1993, the Slackware Linux Project has aimed at producing the most "UNIX-like" Linux distribution out there. Slackware complies with the published Linux standards, such as the Linux File System Standard. We have always considered simplicity and stability paramount, and as a result Slackware has become one of the most popular, stable, and friendly distributions available.
The Slackware forum at LQ has the most posts. You will find more users of Slackware (vs. FC) able to help you out of these jams.

Slackware does not hide what it's doing behind GUIs ... you can do all your system configuration and maintenance in CLI (command line interface), where you see everything that happens while you do it. This might be different from your past experiences, but will be easier each time you use it.

Look up your laptop at Linux on Laptops and TuxMobil Linux Laptop & Notebook Installation Guides to see if anyone's posted information about it. You might find the solution in a HOW-TO on one of those sites.
 
Old 10-09-2007, 01:11 AM   #27
ENDI1111
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 93

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Hill View Post
Do you mean that Fedora Core is not a high school science project?

We thought it was the fork when RedHat announced officially in 2004 that it couldn't produce a reliable desktop Linux OS.


ENDI1111,

Slackware is the oldest surviving Linux distribution. Quoting from What is Slackware Linux?:

The Slackware forum at LQ has the most posts. You will find more users of Slackware (vs. FC) able to help you out of these jams.

Slackware does not hide what it's doing behind GUIs ... you can do all your system configuration and maintenance in CLI (command line interface), where you see everything that happens while you do it. This might be different from your past experiences, but will be easier each time you use it.

Look up your laptop at Linux on Laptops and TuxMobil Linux Laptop & Notebook Installation Guides to see if anyone's posted information about it. You might find the solution in a HOW-TO on one of those sites.
Hey guys I really appreciate the help. That is what these forums is all about. All of our lives are tapestries of student/teacher conundrums in all its shapes and fashions. I'm gonna jump to Distrowatch and get slackware on a download. FC has been frustrating...I like it...One of my reasonings is that website that you referenced Bruce...Linux on Laptops. When I bought my HP laptop, oddly, on 9/11 on of the first google searches that I did was Linux on Laptops as a search and came across the previously mentioned website. I have the HP Pavillion dv6000...and on this particular model the site had Fedora Core 6 on it. Sooooo I have been trying to adapt to this distro while at the same time picking up on my Linux Know-How!!!! Again I thank those of you who have provided as much help as you could.
---I like to keep my glass half full...how bout you?---
 
Old 10-09-2007, 06:57 AM   #28
Hangdog42
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,803
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422
You know, you might consider dropping back to FC6 if you want to stick with Fedora. At least as far as wireless is concerned, FC7 is an unholy abomination that needs to have a very large wooden stake driven through its heart. And that goes double for Broadcom victims, uh, I mean users.

And I'll add my voice to those suggesting Slackware. It isn't the easiest distro to pick up, but a LOT of the criticism about it is overblown, and once you've learned it, you have a good, rock solid distro. And you never have to worry about an upgrade borking your system the way Fedora seems to love to do.
 
Old 10-09-2007, 04:03 PM   #29
ENDI1111
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 93

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hangdog42 View Post
You know, you might consider dropping back to FC6 if you want to stick with Fedora. At least as far as wireless is concerned, FC7 is an unholy abomination that needs to have a very large wooden stake driven through its heart. And that goes double for Broadcom victims, uh, I mean users.

And I'll add my voice to those suggesting Slackware. It isn't the easiest distro to pick up, but a LOT of the criticism about it is overblown, and once you've learned it, you have a good, rock solid distro. And you never have to worry about an upgrade borking your system the way Fedora seems to love to do.
OK...so I have the latest version of Slackware on a DVD/RW...I am trying to look through the website on some different info. How well does Slackware support HP laptops with the AMD64x2 technology?
 
Old 10-09-2007, 04:39 PM   #30
Hangdog42
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,803
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422
My understanding is that the problem isn't AMD so much as the 64 bit thing. Slackware itself is 32 bits, but there are a couple of 64 bit ports. Since my rigs are 32 bits, I've never played with them.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"cp -p" fails with "cp: setting permissions for `/home/svbld/t': Invalid argument" mkhesin Red Hat 1 02-28-2007 12:57 AM
Ndiswrapper "Invalid driver" error - but it worked before i switched distros! drewbug01 Linux - Wireless Networking 5 11-01-2006 12:36 PM
"Invalid driver" Slack 10.1 moosegoose Linux - Wireless Networking 9 09-12-2005 05:11 PM
Cedega from Fat32 (Invalid path "." given for "--use-dos-cwd") bdox Linux - Software 0 03-30-2005 11:24 AM
Step three on ndiswrapper froze"invalid driver" bigrig2004 Linux - Wireless Networking 13 12-21-2004 07:28 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking > Linux - Wireless Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:31 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration