LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Virtualization and Cloud
User Name
Password
Linux - Virtualization and Cloud This forum is for the discussion of all topics relating to Linux Virtualization and Linux Cloud platforms. Xen, KVM, OpenVZ, VirtualBox, VMware, Linux-VServer and all other Linux Virtualization platforms are welcome. OpenStack, CloudStack, ownCloud, Cloud Foundry, Eucalyptus, Nimbus, OpenNebula and all other Linux Cloud platforms are welcome. Note that questions relating solely to non-Linux OS's should be asked in the General forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-11-2011, 01:09 AM   #1
mufy
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Kuwait
Distribution: Currently - AIX | Previously - RHEL 4 ES, FC 10
Posts: 206
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 30
Require : Free virtualization software on Windows XP to install RHEL 6.1


Hi Guys,
I'm in the process of setting up a 2-node RHEL 6.1 cluster to do a proof-of-concept for Oracle on Linux. Last night, standing in the freezing datacenter I was disappointed to learn that the hardware at my disposal (IBM eServer x366) is not compatible with RHEL 6.1.

So, I'm thinking of creating this setup on my Windows box as a virtual environment. Since VMWare does not come free, I was hoping to learn what options are at my disposal to achieve this.
 
Old 07-11-2011, 02:02 AM   #2
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
Vmware server IS free.
 
Old 07-11-2011, 02:04 AM   #3
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
I would really be sure RHEL would work OK on that box though.
 
Old 07-11-2011, 02:26 AM   #4
mufy
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Kuwait
Distribution: Currently - AIX | Previously - RHEL 4 ES, FC 10
Posts: 206

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 30
Hi Chris,
What made me to think on the contrary was as I began the installation on one of the boxes, after having passed the initial welcome screen and selected to install, I received a black screen with an active mouse pointer. Going to the other terminal I could see that my enter keystrokes were doing stuffs like selcting language, etc. But I could see none of those activities in the GUI.

Then I opted for 'linux text', did the complete installation and was unable to issue 'startx'. All this made me to dig through the compatibility and I found that the model was not listed there.

Thanks for the VMWare info though. Trying to set it up now.
 
Old 07-11-2011, 02:56 AM   #5
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
I'm sure you could get X working, but in general a server should not run X anyway. I would personally install nx on it and get a graphical display remotely IF i were to need one.
 
Old 07-11-2011, 03:08 AM   #6
mufy
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Kuwait
Distribution: Currently - AIX | Previously - RHEL 4 ES, FC 10
Posts: 206

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 30
Any particular reason why you'd not want GUI to run on the server? And what was the 'nx' you were referring to?
 
Old 07-11-2011, 03:21 AM   #7
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
it's more software, it's more memory and RAM usage, it's more possible instability and security issues.

Just google for NX, it's like VNC but not awful.
 
Old 07-11-2011, 01:17 PM   #8
dyasny
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: Canada
Distribution: RHEL,Fedora
Posts: 995

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
x366 is not very new, but should be able to run RHEL6 just fine, given the right specs.

Still, the X issue should be resolvable, and as it was mentioned earlier - there's no reason to run X on a server machine, unless X is required as a server specific service.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RHEL 5.2 Client Install w/Virtualization works: non-Virtualized install does not rkmason Red Hat 1 06-04-2008 10:05 AM
require samsung gprs modem software for rhel 4 saikasavar Linux - Desktop 0 10-16-2007 01:47 AM
What's the quickest and/or best virtualization software to run Windows under linux? cwncool Linux - Software 2 12-07-2006 07:57 AM
LXer: Microsoft, Altiris set virtualization software free at LinuxWorld LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-14-2006 03:03 PM
Free Virtualization software for Linux Buy Linux DVD Linux - Software 7 03-28-2006 08:40 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Virtualization and Cloud

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration