Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Virtualization and Cloud
User Name
Linux - Virtualization and Cloud This forum is for the discussion of all topics relating to Linux Virtualization and Linux Cloud platforms. Xen, KVM, OpenVZ, VirtualBox, VMware, Linux-VServer and all other Linux Virtualization platforms are welcome. OpenStack, CloudStack, ownCloud, Cloud Foundry, Eucalyptus, Nimbus, OpenNebula and all other Linux Cloud platforms are welcome. Note that questions relating solely to non-Linux OS's should be asked in the General forum.


  Search this Thread
Old 08-05-2013, 02:20 PM   #1
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Villahermosa, Bucharest, Birminham, Brooklyn, Beverly
Distribution: Mandriva
Posts: 118

Rep: Reputation: 15
From virtualbox to Xen

A new server will arrive at a friend office with a Xeon processor with VT and also 16GB RAM.

They don't have a deployment/production, development server, Winbugs-server so I recommend him to virtualize.

I recommend him using Xen, but he said he is more familiar with Virtualbox as a user. I want to know what advantage/disadvantages are on Virtualbox over Xen and if this project is viable/recommended.
Old 08-05-2013, 04:42 PM   #2
Ser Olmy
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2012
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,458

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
The main difference is that Xen is a bare-metal hypervisor, while VirtualBox is a "hosted" hypervisor which runs as a service on the host OS.

The VirtualBox UI, while very easy to use, gives the impression that the product is designed to be used on end-user workstations: There's no option for having a VM start automatically when the host OS boots, and there's no support for using iSCSI, AoE or even raw partitions as VM storage.

Having said that, most of the limitations in VirtualBox are related to the UI rather than the product itself. You can use raw devices as storage if you create a .vmdk file, and you can start VMs automatically in the background, as long as you use the CLI tools. I mean, the product even supports Live Migration ("Teleportation" in VirtualBox-speak), and the network connectivity options in VirtualBox are surprisingly flexible.

While I probably wouldn't have chosen VirtualBox as a hypervisor in a production environment, there's nothing inherently wrong about doing so. My main concern would be storage, as having a bunch of .vdk files in a directory on the server is not the most elegant or scalable solution.


virtualbox, xen

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Intel Haswell Linux Virtualization: KVM vs. Xen vs. VirtualBox LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-08-2013 02:32 AM
LXer: Ubuntu 11.10: Xen vs. KVM vs. VirtualBox LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-31-2011 11:51 PM
Xen Vs VMWare Vs Sun VirtualBox yasir.iqbal Linux - Virtualization and Cloud 1 05-09-2010 03:39 AM
Xen vs. VirtualBox vs. VMware. which is better for running several virtual machines? accend Linux - Server 3 05-06-2009 09:35 AM
LXer: Managing Xen With Xen-Tools, Xen-Shell, And Argo LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-05-2006 12:21 PM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Virtualization and Cloud

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration