Linux - Virtualization and CloudThis forum is for the discussion of all topics relating to Linux Virtualization and Linux Cloud platforms. Xen, KVM, OpenVZ, VirtualBox, VMware, Linux-VServer and all other Linux Virtualization platforms are welcome. OpenStack, CloudStack, ownCloud, Cloud Foundry, Eucalyptus, Nimbus, OpenNebula and all other Linux Cloud platforms are welcome. Note that questions relating solely to non-Linux OS's should be asked in the General forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi. I want to run linux within win7. It sounded like it should be pretty easy with VirtualBox, but I've tried several recent versions of Ubuntu and they all seem to have problems.
Can anybody suggest a nice, easy to setup and easy to use, solid distro to run under VirtualBox or something similar?
Hmmm - maybe OpenSuSE.
I have run Arch for years under VBox on Win7. If I get bored overnight I'll try OpenSuSE for you. If I can remember why I would want to run Win7 ....
BTW - I am not suggesting Arch meets your criteria.
Last edited by syg00; 07-07-2013 at 03:05 AM.
Reason: BTW
however , if you use OpenSUSE 12.3 ( the current )
it REQUIRES a LOT of system resources
The Gnome3 desktop needs a 3d card installed ( a chip on the MOBO will mostly do )
The KDE 4 DE also needs a good system to run well
SUSE is a bit bloated
I like to describe it as :
" --- Novell tossed in EVERYTHING including "the kitchen sink " , and for good measure they also tossed in your neighbors "kitchen sink" --- "
do not get me wrong , i like OpenSUSE , and it has a longer lifespan than Fedora .
though it is a bit too GUI centric
for most things it is normally easier to use the gui tools than the terminal .
There are some exceptions but for the most part you do not have to touch the terminal a lot unless you want to like i do
Hi, you could try Puppy Linux, you won't have to install on your system anything save from a file with your personal settings and configurations and you won't need to use Virtualbox at all
Consider downloading pre-made virtual appliances. Some distro's offer them directly. Some web sites offer them although they are usually a bit older versions.
One might even be able to use a hybrid iso or usb image to run a vm and then make a few mods.
I think a lot of my problems were due to VirtualBox. I had tried puppy under it and it didn't work then did a clean install of VirtualBox on a different pc and the exact same puppy distro worked great!
I don't know if this would be called heresy to the opensource community, but you can also try VMWare player since it's free. I've been using it to practice some RedHat stuff using CentOS and it installed with zero problems.
Last edited by Orbital11; 07-15-2013 at 07:02 PM.
Reason: added name of distro
I don't know if this would be called heresy to the opensource community, but you can also try VMWare player since it's free. I've been using it to practice some RedHat stuff using CentOS and it installed with zero problems.
If you want to run something with desktop effects enabled or that uses 3D I would even recommend to use VMware, its 3D support is better (faster, more supported features) and almost any distro comes with video drivers for VMware products by default.
I think a lot of my problems were due to VirtualBox. I had tried puppy under it and it didn't work then did a clean install of VirtualBox on a different pc and the exact same puppy distro worked great!
Thanks everybody.
I was going to say VirtualBox... but it seems, as you said, you are having problems with it. Have you attempted to diagnosis it on your computer? You may want to try an older build or take a look at their community and see if anyone else has had any problems similar to yours. As far as an Linux OS goes... my choice is Debian.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
I would suggest trying VMWare also -- tests seem to find it out performs VirtualBox (I didn't find that under debian for some reason so I'm running VB).
As to the distro -- I would go for something with XFCE or LXDE as a desktop so the easiest should be either Xubuntu, Lubuntu or Linux Mint XFCE or LXDE versions. The more modern desktops (Unity [Ubuntu], Gnome and KDE) tend to use hardware acceleration and can be a a little troublesome in virtual machines though I find Unity is the worst, followed for some reason by Gnome though others may find different.
Try LXLE (on SourceForge). It runs the LXDE version of Ubuntu LTS (12.04). It's lightweight, but has a lot of stuff in it and installs really easy. I installed it under VirtualBox on my very busy 2009 vintage iMac and it works very nicely. A full distro like Ubuntu or OpenSUSE seems to have issues because of resource needs. FYI, I only allocated 1GB of RAM for the VM, but that seems to be enough.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.