Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
No, it will not be radically different. The reason for the switch to a new major version is not a technical one, it is more or less because Mr Torvalds want to keep the minor version numbers low.
The biggest difference will probably be more obtuse devices supported by drivers. They will also probably decide that programs that have worked well for years are integrally flawed, and throw them out (deprecate them) and start with alpha versions of the new tools that are much more unreliable than the old ones.
The biggest difference will probably be more obtuse devices supported by drivers. They will also probably decide that programs that have worked well for years are integrally flawed, and throw them out (deprecate them) and start with alpha versions of the new tools that are much more unreliable than the old ones.
Stop the nonsense. The kernel developers are well known to not remove anything that is still in use even by only one person (see the story why EISA support is still present).
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,679
Rep:
I'll probably either use it as soon as it appears in the Experimental repository or get bored and grab it straight from kernel.org on one of my machines but I'm not expecting to notice anything cool apart from a number change.
The biggest difference will probably be more obtuse devices supported by drivers. They will also probably decide that programs that have worked well for years are integrally flawed, and throw them out (deprecate them) and start with alpha versions of the new tools that are much more unreliable than the old ones.
I read on Slashdot that the new kernel will have improved open-source graphics drivers. Woot!
My understanding is that there will not be any breaking changes, in fact this was going to be 3.20 but Linus thinks it's a good time for a version bump.
4.0 is pretty decent. With the last updates (which did include some X updates) and the openarena updates, things got a lot better... but there are still problems with supertuxracer though. I haven't seen hard hangs (openarena would hang right off), video is a lot better so far, but when there is some heavy texture mapping going on there does seem to be limits.
But nothing requiring a reboot.
There is that mount issue with 3.18 that I never saw with the 4.0 - but I think that is a problem with systemd shutdowns. I don't see it because the initram I'm using is still from before the 3.18 updates.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.