[SOLVED] Why do non-working packages remain in distro repos after many years?
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Why do non-working packages remain in distro repos after many years?
Hi.
Why do broken packages remain in distros repositories after many years?
For example, for years now Vice (a C64 emulator) has not worked in Ubuntu. I checked Debian Jessie and it also does not run (I presume has not worked for years also). I am more surprised that Debian still has Vice.
No doubt, there are more packages like this in many distros.
Many emulators, such as that one, require ROM/BIOS/OS files which are NOT released under any sort of open source or public domain license. As such, they can't be legally included in various distribution repositories. It's the same reason why the Doctor Who xscreensaver includes a placeholder "image not found" image rather than the Doctor Who logo.
That's the reason why you have to do extra effort and download files from other locations to get them to work.
I've used the windows version in Wine without issue for a long while now. I think I'll stick with that for now.
No problem. You should give the installation a go though - I always think it's preferable to get an application running natively in Linux, if it is possible, rather than running under Mono, Wine or in a Windows VM.
No problem. You should give the installation a go though - I always think it's preferable to get an application running natively in Linux, if it is possible, rather than running under Mono, Wine or in a Windows VM.
The Windows version comes with the ROM. Not sure how legal that is. Most linux distributions won't take the chance.
The ROM in question isn't on any cassette tape, it's the physical ROM installed within the C64 itself. It includes Microsoft BASIC (which probably actually isn't necessary for most games), the built in character ROM fonts, and the KERNAL (which is necessary to load anything from cassette, but might not be necessary for some cartridge based games). None of these are public domain or open source; none may be legally freely distributed.
The ROM in question isn't on any cassette tape, it's the physical ROM installed within the C64 itself. It includes Microsoft BASIC (which probably actually isn't necessary for most games), the built in character ROM fonts, and the KERNAL (which is necessary to load anything from cassette, but might not be necessary for some cartridge based games). None of these are public domain or open source; none may be legally freely distributed.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.