Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
View Poll Results: Which type of compression do you preffer?
|
gz
|
  
|
24 |
46.15% |
bz2
|
  
|
32 |
61.54% |
zip
|
  
|
11 |
21.15% |
rar
|
  
|
9 |
17.31% |
ace
|
  
|
1 |
1.92% |
arj
|
  
|
1 |
1.92% |
7z
|
  
|
7 |
13.46% |
jam
|
  
|
1 |
1.92% |
lha
|
  
|
1 |
1.92% |
z
|
  
|
1 |
1.92% |
zoo
|
  
|
2 |
3.85% |
zac
|
  
|
1 |
1.92% |
 |
02-16-2006, 07:43 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: London
Distribution: Arch Linux, Debian
Posts: 184
Rep:
|
Which type of compression do you preffer?
Which type of compression do you preffer?
Please compare with speed of making/extracting , compress ratio
|
|
|
02-16-2006, 09:20 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Distribution: Slackware, Mandriva, Debian derivatives, +BSD/ Solaris/ Minix/ plan9/ GNU/HURD...
Posts: 185
Rep:
|
Well, I'm strictly a Linux user, so it's mainly gzip or b2zip for me. b2zip has the smaller compression. As far as speed goes, I don't seem to notice significant spee differences. These two are just my favorite mainly because I can always count on their being supported on any GNU/Linux/BSD/OpenSolaris system.
|
|
|
02-16-2006, 09:22 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Virginia
Distribution: PacketProtector
Posts: 331
Rep:
|
For no reason, other than it is what I seem to run into most ofter I am primarly a 'gz' type myself. It seems to be avaialable in the places that I need it.
|
|
|
02-16-2006, 09:32 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
I mainly use Linux and other Unix like OSes so bzip and gzip are the compressions tools I use. I prefer bzip2 because it has a better compression ratio than gzip.
|
|
|
02-17-2006, 03:43 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: London
Distribution: Arch Linux, Debian
Posts: 184
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I heared z7 and some other compression tools , make better compression , but they are slow in creating than bz2 and gz types
|
|
|
02-17-2006, 04:46 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Distribution: Kubuntu 14.04 LTS
Posts: 915
Rep:
|
Being a Linux user I almost always use gzip or bzip2. bzip2 has better compression but takes a bit longer to compress/uncompress. The Solaris machines at our work don't have bzip2 installed so in that case I need to use gzip.
|
|
|
02-17-2006, 05:02 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Out
Posts: 3,307
Rep:
|
Bzip2 and 7zip for linux and windows
|
|
|
02-28-2006, 08:40 PM
|
#8
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Belo Horizonte/BRAZIL
Distribution: Mandrake 9.0
Posts: 9
Rep:
|
As a Mac user, I missed the .sit (StuffIt) compression format (although I know it's proprietary, so as .rar).
But my preferences are .bz2 and .7z, and principally for this last one, which I think has a great future ahead if more developers/coders interest on it
|
|
|
02-28-2006, 09:16 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: Slackware 10.1
Posts: 35
Rep:
|
As a Linux user, I prefer bz2. As a Linux user with a lot of Windows-using friends, i use zip. Many times people -without a clue of what Linux is- asked how i treat their "zipped" files without winzip... 
|
|
|
02-28-2006, 09:24 PM
|
#10
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
I am a system manager of Linux and unix-like OSes, the bz2 and gzip always are the compression tool I prefer.
They have higher compression ratio,and almost built-in on various platform.
|
|
|
02-28-2006, 09:51 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Posts: 516
Rep:
|
I just use plain old zip in windows and linux.
No need for fancy, high compression zip tools with the low price of hard drives today.
The only times I need to zip something is for emailing, uploading, or privacy.
Anyone can open a zip file.
|
|
|
02-28-2006, 11:26 PM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Tasmania
Distribution: Xen Debian Lenny/Sid
Posts: 578
Rep:
|
bzip2 for me
gzip for others
zip for everything else
|
|
|
03-01-2006, 07:50 AM
|
#13
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2005
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
Normally gzip, but rzip and lzop in special cases.
$ time gzip sg.tar
real 0m0.574s
user 0m0.544s
sys 0m0.016s
$ time bzip2 sb.tar
real 0m8.148s
user 0m8.109s
sys 0m0.032s
$ time lzop sl.tar
real 0m0.084s
user 0m0.064s
sys 0m0.024s
$ time rzip sr.tar
real 0m3.307s
user 0m3.212s
sys 0m0.096s
$ ll s?.tar*
-rw-r--r-- 1 user ftp 1196002 Mar 1 13:31 sb.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 user ftp 1404466 Mar 1 13:31 sg.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user ftp 6635520 Mar 1 13:31 sl.tar
-rw-r--r-- 1 user ftp 1954222 Mar 1 13:31 sl.tar.lzo
-rw-r--r-- 1 user ftp 1010341 Mar 1 13:33 sr.tar.rz
|
|
|
03-03-2006, 09:07 PM
|
#14
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Near Philadelphia, Pa. USA
Distribution: Fedora - Red Hat
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
Compression
Windows / DOS - WinZip / PKzip 2.5
HP-UX - gzip
Linux - not sure yet. Still new to Linux, not UNIX.
Most likely gzip or zip.
Derek.
RH FC4
|
|
|
03-04-2006, 02:02 AM
|
#15
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: SuSE, Ubuntu
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
I like bz2. It has a large compression ratio. 
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|