LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


View Poll Results: Which of these is your favorite email client?
Claws Mail 5 8.62%
Sylpheed 2 3.45%
Thunderbird 25 43.10%
Other 26 44.83%
Voters: 58. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-01-2016, 11:56 PM   #16
life0riley
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2016
Location: Salem, OR, USA
Distribution: Kubuntu, Xubuntu, Debian, Fedora
Posts: 36

Rep: Reputation: 4

I chose "Other" for Kmail. There should have been a selection for Kmail. It is a full featured email client and does not need third party applications or add-ons. It was listed as one of the top 5 email clients for Linux in 2015.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-02-2016, 03:12 AM   #17
cowlitzron
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Washington state
Distribution: Devuan, Slackware, Ubuntu Christian Edition
Posts: 188

Rep: Reputation: 36
I voted other for FossaMail which is Moonchild Production's fork of Thunderbird. Has the old interface of Thunderbird with security updates.
 
Old 03-02-2016, 07:44 AM   #18
rtmistler
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT Debian, Angstrom, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 9,410
Blog Entries: 13

Rep: Reputation: 4495Reputation: 4495Reputation: 4495Reputation: 4495Reputation: 4495Reputation: 4495Reputation: 4495Reputation: 4495Reputation: 4495Reputation: 4495Reputation: 4495
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMcCann View Post
I started on Thunderbird, because that's what I was given. Then I migrated to Evolution, as less confusing.
I started with Evolution because that's what I was given and pretty much continue to use that. I'm sure there was a different one long ago, and I just used it. I think so long as something is serviceable I have no complaints.
 
Old 03-02-2016, 10:42 AM   #19
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,441

Rep: Reputation: 3994Reputation: 3994Reputation: 3994Reputation: 3994Reputation: 3994Reputation: 3994Reputation: 3994Reputation: 3994Reputation: 3994Reputation: 3994Reputation: 3994
Do note that "Email Client of the Year" was one of the MCA's this year. You can see the full results here: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...ar-4175562735/

--jeremy
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-02-2016, 10:59 AM   #20
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib."
Posts: 6,904
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 4283Reputation: 4283Reputation: 4283Reputation: 4283Reputation: 4283Reputation: 4283Reputation: 4283Reputation: 4283Reputation: 4283Reputation: 4283Reputation: 4283
Quote:
Originally Posted by disciplepup View Post
Seamonkey.
There are lots of Firefox and Thunderbird extensions I wouldn't want to give up, and they run in Seamonkey (a few I need to modify so that they do).
I almost always have a browser open and I really don't want to run two big programs if I can get away with just one*.
Firefox and Thunderbird always seem to be changing their ui, so it is easier to keep it how I like it in Seamonkey.

*You might ask why not use the Gmail web interface or similar, but I find them quite annoying.
+1 for SeaMonkey.
I liked KMail, but last I looked the KMail developers still hadn't given it the ability to properly forwarded HTML mail and HTML mail accounts for better than 90% of the e-mail that arrives each day. We are now what, 16 years into the 21st Century?

Last edited by cwizardone; 03-02-2016 at 02:34 PM. Reason: Typo.
 
Old 03-02-2016, 11:01 AM   #21
jamison20000e
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: ...uncanny valley... infinity\1975; (randomly born:) Milwaukee, WI, US( + travel,) Earth( I wish,) END BORDER$!◣◢┌∩┐ Fe26-E,e...
Distribution: any GPL that works well on freest; has been KDE, CLI, Novena but open... http://goo.gl/NqgqJx &c ;-)
Posts: 4,452
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 1449Reputation: 1449Reputation: 1449Reputation: 1449Reputation: 1449Reputation: 1449Reputation: 1449Reputation: 1449Reputation: 1449Reputation: 1449
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy View Post
Do note that "Email Client of the Year" was one of the MCA's this year. You can see the full results here: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...ar-4175562735/

--jeremy
I did not vote there either...
 
Old 03-02-2016, 01:56 PM   #22
FredGSanford
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Distribution: Mageia 7 - Debian 10 - Artix Linux
Posts: 1,142
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 207Reputation: 207Reputation: 207
Other, because I really don't use provider email anymore, webmail. I do use Mutt for system mail and was a big fan of Thunderbird when I did need it.
 
Old 03-04-2016, 10:34 AM   #23
r37
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2015
Distribution: in the past Mandrake, Debian, Knoppix, Antix, now Devuan
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankbell View Post
Sypheed/Claws is my second choice. They are so closely related I think of them as one thing.
FMPOV, Sylpheed and Claws Mail differ remarkably. Sylpheed is inherently portable, Claws Mail is not. Furthermore, Sylpheed is remarkably faster and less resources-hungry; it is perfectly possible to see it on low-end machines.

Generally, Sylpheed is my client #1. From time to time I use Claws as Sylpheed can not handle return receipt / disposition notification requests reasonably.

As concerns Thunderbird: generally quite nice but with *very ugly* flaws in attachment handling (see bugzilla); also no logging. I was using it from time to time but completely abandoned some time ago.
 
Old 03-05-2016, 05:45 AM   #24
normanlinux
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2013
Location: S.E. England
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 161

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by BW-userx View Post
google mail

because Linux install mail servies keeps my mail on my cp and I do a lot of starting over just cuz -- so I'd end up loosing all of my emails --- back up restore too much of a hassale
Don't use pop3, use imap
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-05-2016, 05:57 AM   #25
normanlinux
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2013
Location: S.E. England
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 161

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Kmail

Unfortunately the current kmail does have some annoyances from time to time, but I gave up on Thunderbird nearly 2 years ago when it started giving me severe grief.

For reasons unknown it decided to lie about the number of emails arriving. I would regularly get messages informing me that I had several thousand new emails (I think that the record was telling me I had over 20,000 new emails when I actually only had a few). Being on Arch I did a quick pacman -S to reinstall it. Didn't help. Couple that with being told my LinkedIn messages were spam ...

I don't get nearly as much aggro with kmail - although friends and family are happy with Thunderbird. I won't choose anything gnome, I hate it and its awful kludgy internals. It is a real pain when I have to use gnome/gtk-based applications.
 
Old 03-05-2016, 09:05 AM   #26
CerebrusMaximus
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2014
Location: Alexandria, VA
Distribution: Debian 8.3 64-bit
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I use Sylpheed; I like the ability to export in MBOX format, as opposed to exporting in MH format. Sylpheed is a good, basic email program, that is simple to use, and gets the job done. I can PGP sign and encrypt my email, if desired. I can concatenate messages, and delete duplicate messages.

The one thing I would like to see with Sylpheed is an archive utility that aggregates All email messages, from All folders, into a single file (similar to an Outlook PST file, but human readable, as in XML).

My calendar, task, and notes functions are accomplished through the use of Osmo.

Last edited by CerebrusMaximus; 03-05-2016 at 09:07 AM.
 
Old 03-05-2016, 10:16 AM   #27
sgosnell
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Baja Oklahoma
Distribution: Debian Stable and Unstable
Posts: 1,943

Rep: Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537
A new email client I'm trying is Nylas N1. It has a nice interface, but still a basic flaw in that it can't deal with encryption/decryption, signing, or anything else related to security. There is one person working on incorporating encryption, but so far he has shown little understanding of it. The N1 developers seem to think they don't need to address it, and so far have refused to do so, and therefore I can't use it full-time. I check it from time to time, but I'm not sure it's going to be viable as it is. But if encryption isn't important to you, it may be worth looking at.
 
Old 03-07-2016, 01:28 PM   #28
bill_from_tampa
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Tampa
Distribution: Debian testing
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: 4
+1 for mu4e

I've tried evolution, kmail, mutt, thunderbird, gnus, rmail, & pine over the years (...many years). I use each one till it flakes out or otherwise misbehaves (which in each case could have easily been my fault). I've had good luck with mu4e (in emacs, obviously) for the past 6 months. I would really prefer to use kmail for the features, but 'upgrades' to the kde infrastructure have driven me away from kde.
 
Old 03-15-2016, 04:05 PM   #29
ant_psydurix
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: isolated mountain country mid north coast australia
Distribution: kubuntu/xubuntu 14.04
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
Thunderbird

Hi,
I use thunderbird presently;in gnome I found evolution quite fine,even in kde., but found it too slow when 60< mails were in inbox. Now with kde.,k-mail is 2nd choice to thunderbird for me.
 
Old 03-15-2016, 04:51 PM   #30
Michael Uplawski
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2015
Location: Apples
Distribution: Apple-selling shops, markets and direct marketing
Posts: 1,211
Blog Entries: 32

Rep: Reputation: 670Reputation: 670Reputation: 670Reputation: 670Reputation: 670Reputation: 670
Mutt.

I know what it does and why. Most of this is, because the mail-system was devised in a certain way and not another. With other mail-clients I often get the impression that they are there to provide things that the mail-system was not meant for. People who ask me for help with their mail often do so, because they demand too much or their mail-software promises too much. Mutt is like home. All is familiar.

Last edited by Michael Uplawski; 03-16-2016 at 07:10 AM.
 
  


Reply

Tags
email


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Favorite torrent client? Laodiceans Slackware 41 09-26-2010 04:13 AM
Your favorite EMail server please ... Mufasa Linux - Server 1 03-19-2010 03:27 AM
LXer: MailRadar - Your Favorite Email Community LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-12-2007 06:10 PM
Favorite torrent client? GammaPoint Linux - Software 13 09-25-2007 01:43 PM
What is your favorite IRC client? php Linux - General 18 06-18-2002 05:42 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration