Which free donwnloadable distros offer server functionality
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
All of them you can setup as a server. They might not all have that server specific install like redhat has during the install but you can always customize and only installed what you need.
Originally posted by tlan Also is there a version that you can recommend.
and which linux distro's have the most install base.
well, that's really all opinion based. personally i'm going to tell you slackware, as that is my distro of choice. i'd also recommend redhat, its the most popular choice and most used by commercial businesses as well.
Redhat is usually considered the most popular, and Debian is up there too.
The server is simply a program, like Apache, that comes with basically every distro. Unless the distro specifically says it doesnt come with it, I wouldnt worry.
And Mandrake DOES come with all the standard servers.
Administering a server is the admins job, one wont be "better".
Distribution: CentOS 3.3-4, OpenBSD 3.3, Fedora Core 4, Ubuntu, Novell Open Enterprise Server
Posts: 213
Rep:
Redhat's Server version of it's distro is very expensive and not practical for your purposes. What kind of server do you want? A webserver? A fileserver that your windows machines can download mp3s from? A firewall? You need to know the answers to these functions first.
You can strip down ANY distro and make it a "Server" distro with a little time and effort. It isn't really all that hard if you have a little bit of time to waste. I do have a reccomendation for you though... I know of several schools that have set up esmith server on a monster server with dual cpus and gigs of ram for servicing hundreds of thin clients with LTSP. Esmith scales very well.
One of the main schools I would be talking about would be a medium sized K12 school in Vassalboro, Maine and the great work done by Mr. David Trask. I have spoken with him personally over the phone and like his idealogy. Several schools in Oregon are following suite from what I hear. Mitel Networks just recently purchased esmith, inc along with esmith server but it is still available to download. They just tried to say that it is unsupported and would prefer you pay them for support.
I have also heard very good reviews of Astaro Security Linux
you already have mandrake... i see you didn't try to install it as you'd seen the "server" options plainly on the screen. my wife could not have missed them and she is legally blind (really).
apache, sendmail and postfix, proftp, etc all installed at setup time.
good luck, you might need it if you didn't see this.
Enigmasolder, This is exactly why I would like to switch to linux and this server would be setup as a internal webserver, firewall, internet gateway, File server, print server, Authentication server and Bandwidth throttler.
Iggy man,
I installed Mandrake and yes did see the server functions but I had serious video problems with my 3dfx voodoo3 card. I had to install it twice and to me redhat was just more steady and reliable.
Anyways I installed Redhat and had nothing but problems getting samba to work. I read all the documentation here and on the web but no luck.
I also noticed redhat 9 uses iptables not ipchains and I could not find any docs on this new format needless to say that did not work either.
Slackware is a good choice cuz it don't enable XFree86 by default, so it doesn't waste memory on creating a graphical framebuffer that you probably don't use, cuz it's a server. Other distros require you to get waist-deep in shell scripts to disable X from starting, from my experience.
and here's the smb.conf file I use (works on samba 2.2), note that encrypt passwords is necessary to connect from win2k/xp. and you will have to man smbpasswd (and use it) to create user accounts to log in with.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.