What programs would you like to see ported to Linux?
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
best chance linux appears to have is to become user friendly before the vista is released thatway the community will be able to make a big impact and if the vista release of windows contiues to drop features chances are people are not going to spend 400-500 pounds on a release that will not have all the features introduced until later
How about a gui based vpn client similar to the WinXP network connection setup or the Cisco client.
Not for me of course, but I have to support certain Sales types that can't seem to do anything without a gui but for certain reasons have to run Linux.
We need a 1-click DVD backup program like DVD-Rebuilder ported to Linux. This is a freeware application, like DVD Shrink, but more robust. I have not seen one for Linux yet. Also, the very powerful, very high quality encoder it makes use of: Cinema Craft Encoder, is not available yet on Linux.
Distribution: gentoo, debian, ubuntu live gnome 2.10
Posts: 440
Rep:
Tar would be a much better choice, since you can tell it to split archives into DVD sized chunks and then you can extract them all again later. perhaps you'd like a front-end for tar?
Originally posted by RobNyc I really want Windows Aim, Windows Msn, Windows Yahoo .. since they dont even want to work with Wine or Crossover or has anyone gotten it to work?
Gaim is not enough and doesnt have all the features/capacity these windows im clients have
The new kopete supports webcam support.
Kopete does support all networks including IRC.
Distribution: gentoo, debian, ubuntu live gnome 2.10
Posts: 440
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by mike10 thats rely all that linux needs - front-ends or beter front-ends
DO realize the complexity of most terminal apps? adding an interface compatible with tar would be massive, and would still prevent you from doing anything with the input or output.
There are lots of great front ends already, take gnome's 'file-roller' archive manager. There are lots of great front ends.
More to the point, you're right linux does need more front ends, but I'd rather see good apps with crummy front ends than have a bunch of great front ends that don't accopmlish the neccesary tasks. Perhaps one ought to learn that simplest way is often the best, and the commandline is a simple implementation. You can use php, python, perl, c, c++ c# gtk# Qt, and others to create great front ends, but not everyone will agree whch is the best to use, and I'd rather be able to back-up my data without needing a graphical environment, if you ask me.
Distribution: gentoo, debian, ubuntu live gnome 2.10
Posts: 440
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by RobNyc I really want Windows Aim, Windows Msn, Windows Yahoo .. since they dont even want to work with Wine or Crossover or has anyone gotten it to work?
Gaim is not enough and doesnt have all the features/capacity these windows im clients have
I think the Key Here is that noone has tired or cares. I left windows becuse I was looking for alternatives to almost every software available for that platform. I don't understand what those programs offer that kopete, or gaim, or one of a dozen others doesn't.
Perhaps if you explained further... but most of the fetures that are notabley missing related to security risks in exposing your system via instant messenger. What's more, why do you feel that having the 'bnus' advertising is a feature.
As I said above, please explain your complaints against gaim, kopete, et al.
Distribution: Debian amd64 with 32bit libs and Debian 32 bit laptop
Posts: 119
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by mrGenixus DO realize the complexity of most terminal apps? adding an interface compatible with tar would be massive, and would still prevent you from doing anything with the input or output.
There are lots of great front ends already, take gnome's 'file-roller' archive manager. There are lots of great front ends.
More to the point, you're right linux does need more front ends, but I'd rather see good apps with crummy front ends than have a bunch of great front ends that don't accopmlish the neccesary tasks. Perhaps one ought to learn that simplest way is often the best, and the commandline is a simple implementation. You can use php, python, perl, c, c++ c# gtk# Qt, and others to create great front ends, but not everyone will agree whch is the best to use, and I'd rather be able to back-up my data without needing a graphical environment, if you ask me.
I agree but some people have a fobea of the command line, me, I think that M$ has turned into "a bunch of great front ends that don't accomplish the necessary tasks".
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.