What is the basic difference between GNOME and KDE?
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Don't know what exactly you mean by "root level" but for me at least the main fact is that they look very dissimilar - at least back when I still used GNOME. IMHO KDE is much more mature and full featured, but GNOME does have GTK...
Read your reply carefully. May you tell me why do you prefer KDE better than GNOME? Why are you telling KDE much mature though the desktop of those are almost similar and have same access to the programs even in similar presentation.
Whahahah That's a discussion that started a long time ago and still is going on
Simply they are two desktop environments that look very very dissimilar.
It is you that have to choose which is the best for you.
In performance they are almost the same i think you can run all linux application on booth
so it really doesn't matter which u run.
I prefer gnome myself. I think gnome is written in C while KDE is C++. KDE used a non open gui toolkit in it's early days, don't know if thats changed, gnome was always meant to be open source. Bunch of other stuff.
I tried GNOME for a while but never liked how the menu components are arranged, of course it
doesn't matter very much because 80% of the time i'm using a kernel. Furthermore you can personalize you're KDE environment look at: kde-look
PS I think KDE is open source now so if you want to develop go ha head
To clear up the KDE/Gnome arguments on open source/free software.
KDE uses the qt toolkit, produced by TrollTech. It was (past tense) non free, but is now released under a dual license scheme - the GPL and TrollTech's own license. If you want to develop GPL or GPL-license compatible applications, you can do this. If you don't want to use the GPL/GPL compatible license, you have to pay TrollTech for their alternate qt license (that's how they make the money to continue development on qt).
Gnome uses the Gimp Toolkit (GTK+) developed originally for The Gimp, which is licensed under the LGPL. One of the reasons for Gnome coming about was the fact that in the early days KDE was not using a free license. This is no longer the case as I have just explained.
To summarise therefore: Both KDE and Gnome are open source (and possibly also 'free software'. Read some of RMS's literature to understand the difference between the two terms)
The 'basic' difference, then, is that they use difference toolkits with different licenses for their applications.
Originally posted by havelino Furthermore you can personalize you're KDE environment look at: kde-look
You can also personalize your GNOME environment. Look at: GNOME-Look.org (There's a link to GNOME-Look at KDE-Look).
That said, IMHO GNOME is still way behind KDE in the eye candy department. KDE has a lot of support for translucency which GNOME lacks, and in particular KDE's Crystal-GL Window decoration is simply cooler than anything GNOME has to offer.
OTOH, GNOME has support for vector graphics icons, which KDE lacks. Whether this is an advantage or disadvantage is debateable. On the KDE side, bitmap icons are incredibly detailed and can have a "photorealistic look". On the GNOME side, vector graphics may be cartoony but they can be scaled to any size.
if our talking asthetics. gnome feels (to me) like working on the old macs back in highschool. and thats the main reason i dont like it, i dont understand all the technical angles of this argument but kde is like the os most linux migrators know and hate/love
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.