Quote:
Originally posted by Snerkel
i use samba for shares, is NFS better?
|
Better is the wrong word ... more appropriate, and
slightly faster :) Samba will give you more fine-grained
control. One of the things is that with NFS you have to
be very careful with permissions (you should make sure
that root is squashed) and that only certain machines are
allowed to access the NFS shares (have a good look at
/etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny)
Quote:
i want to be able to setup login scripts etc to mount directories when the user logs in. but i want to set this up so it works for unix & windows machines because i run a gentoo/win2k dual boot and i have another machine on my network which is just windows xp (oh and a server of course ;) )
|
I haven't used NFS for Windows, but the last time
I read about it the common statement was that it
doesn't perform quite as well. So, if you want to
use both winDOHs and Linux as a client stick
with Samba.
Quote:
Also that autofs thing, is that actual a program and if so does it get installed on the client machines or the server? or is it an option to go in fstab ?
|
It's both a kernel and user-space thing that gets
configured via fstab :)
Have a look at the entries you get from
man -k autofs
Cheers,
Tink