Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
05-01-2015, 11:41 PM
|
#16
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, EndeavourOS, OpenSUSE, KDE Neon
Posts: 4,029
|
Mono = *nix program build to be able to run Windows .net programs (sorry for saying Silverlight earlier, was thinking Moonlight). Although it may not be needed much longer as MS has open sourced most of .net (haven't seen any native .net tools in linux yet, but haven't looked). So you need Mono installed to be able to run the KeePass program.
Most distro's package a Keepassx 1.x. Has a less secure type of file it saves your passwords as, so is easier to crack into the file. I know Debian that Ubuntu is built off of has KeepassX 1.x and KeePass 2.x. I run KeePass due to the improved security of the new file type, and because I don't really mind having to install Mono.
In the grand scheme of things, if ubuntu offers keepassx 2.x, there is no difference in security level to keepass 2.x. However, if they offer Keepassx 1.x and Keepass 2.x, then Keepass is more secure.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
05-02-2015, 05:43 PM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: Illinois
Distribution: Xubuntu
Posts: 2,037
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timothy Miller
Mono = *nix program build to be able to run Windows .net programs (sorry for saying Silverlight earlier, was thinking Moonlight). Although it may not be needed much longer as MS has open sourced most of .net (haven't seen any native .net tools in linux yet, but haven't looked). So you need Mono installed to be able to run the KeePass program.
Most distro's package a Keepassx 1.x. Has a less secure type of file it saves your passwords as, so is easier to crack into the file. I know Debian that Ubuntu is built off of has KeepassX 1.x and KeePass 2.x. I run KeePass due to the improved security of the new file type, and because I don't really mind having to install Mono.
In the grand scheme of things, if ubuntu offers keepassx 2.x, there is no difference in security level to keepass 2.x. However, if they offer Keepassx 1.x and Keepass 2.x, then Keepass is more secure.
|
Thanks Timothy. Seems to me Keepass2 was the way to go. My Ubuntu Software Center offered "Keepass2" and "KeepassX." I assumed Keepass2 was 2.x but I'm not so sure. I'm attaching a screenshot of what I got (Keepass2). Is this the one with the 2.x (better) encryption? (BTW I already had Mono installed.) I haven't used it yet so it would be easy to uninstall and get KeepassX. Thanks.
|
|
|
05-02-2015, 11:47 PM
|
#18
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, EndeavourOS, OpenSUSE, KDE Neon
Posts: 4,029
|
Yup, that's keepass 2.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
05-02-2015, 11:49 PM
|
#19
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2013
Location: Australia
Distribution: Fedora, Suse,Android, FreeBSD,Kali
Posts: 98
Rep:
|
I don't trust any password manager^_^
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
05-03-2015, 02:31 PM
|
#20
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: Illinois
Distribution: Xubuntu
Posts: 2,037
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timothy Miller
Yup, that's keepass 2.
|
Thanks. So that's the one with the better encryption, right?
|
|
|
05-03-2015, 08:09 PM
|
#21
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, EndeavourOS, OpenSUSE, KDE Neon
Posts: 4,029
|
Correct. Just be sure when you create the file it of the type that ends in x, which it should default to. This is the newer, better encryption file.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
05-03-2015, 08:52 PM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: Illinois
Distribution: Xubuntu
Posts: 2,037
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timothy Miller
Correct. Just be sure when you create the file it of the type that ends in x, which it should default to. This is the newer, better encryption file.
|
Okay, man, thanks.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|