Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
11-15-2008, 11:58 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Distribution: Debian distro family
Posts: 2,419
Rep: 
|
website blocker that can't be defeated by admin?
Is there any software that can block websites and not be overridden by the administrator (by knowing the password, deleting the software, or some other clever trick)? I'd like to keep myself off time-wasting sites (this isn't about making my computer child-safe, as I have none), but if I had a website blocker, what good would it be if I knew the password or if I could delete (or at least shut down) the program?
Last edited by newbiesforever; 11-16-2008 at 12:00 AM.
|
|
|
11-16-2008, 12:18 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2006
Distribution: Debian Linux 11 (Bullseye)
Posts: 3,410
Rep: 
|
God can't do something that god can't undo. So, you'll just have to practice more self control. 
|
|
|
11-16-2008, 12:37 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2008
Location: Northern CA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu, Slackware, Gentoo, Fedora, Red Hat, Puppy Linux
Posts: 370
Rep:
|
Why would you want to prevent a system administrator from being able to administer his computer system? If you want total control of a system then you should buy your own and then you can have free reign over everything on the system. If you don't own it you cannot expect to prevent the authorized administrator from making any changes that they deem necessary or desirable for the good of the system.
|
|
|
11-16-2008, 01:00 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: Slackware64 14.0
Posts: 4,141
Rep: 
|
Amen Quakeboy02
Apart from restraint there's inconvenience. You could have your internet connection go through an external box that you don't have simple access to. In short though, if you can set it up, you can tear it down.
|
|
|
11-16-2008, 03:59 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Directly above centre of the earth, UK
Distribution: SuSE, plus some hopping
Posts: 4,070
|
The only thing that I can think of that you do but not undo is to burn your network cable. But: - it is not exactly software
- it might be a bit more dramatic than you would like
- and, even then, you could buy a new network cable
so the only permanent thing that immediately comes to mind is to become an illegal file sharer and get kicked off the net permanently. I'm not encouraging this, but it is likley to reduce the time you spend on time-wasting websites.
By now, the self control option should be sounding attractive.
|
|
|
11-16-2008, 11:42 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Distribution: Debian distro family
Posts: 2,419
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AuroraCA
Why would you want to prevent a system administrator from being able to administer his computer system? If you want total control of a system then you should buy your own and then you can have free reign over everything on the system. If you don't own it you cannot expect to prevent the authorized administrator from making any changes that they deem necessary or desirable for the good of the system.
|
But I do have total control of it. It's my computer.
|
|
|
11-16-2008, 11:50 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Russia
Distribution: Slackware 12.2
Posts: 1,202
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newbiesforever
But I do have total control of it. It's my computer.
|
This is the main problem, actually.
You are administrator, so you can override any "time-waster blocker" you might install.
|
|
|
11-16-2008, 12:43 PM
|
#8
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2004
Posts: 9
Rep:
|
why not use a random selection of characters to set the password and don't write it down, changing the root password stopping you making changes.
|
|
|
11-16-2008, 08:54 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Russia
Distribution: Slackware 12.2
Posts: 1,202
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by iainmackay85
why not use a random selection of characters to set the password and don't write it down, changing the root password stopping you making changes.
|
When you have physical access to machine, this also can be easily bypassed. 
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|