LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-14-2015, 12:14 AM   #1
kaz2100
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Penguin land, with apple, no gates
Distribution: SlackWare > Debian testing woody(32) sarge etch lenny squeeze(+64) wheezy .. bullseye bookworm
Posts: 1,818

Rep: Reputation: 108Reputation: 108
virus detection, inconsistent


Hya,

Situation
When I used to clamav to check some external HD, clamav found "Win.Trojan.Agent-905394".
However, TrendMicro and Symantec engines do not report any infection.

It look like that some sort of trojan horse, but no further information on web.

The files infected are active printer driver. So it is not easy to get rid of them, without affection functionality.

I have no idea how to resolve this inconsistency. Most probably, linux machines are immune. www.virustotal.com also

Question
Is this file harmful? (for several other windows ones)

closing remark
I appreciate any feedback.
 
Old 10-14-2015, 02:21 AM   #2
ardvark71
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Distribution: Lubuntu 14.04, 22.04, Windows 8.1 and 10
Posts: 6,282
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842
Hi...

It's highly possible that this is a false positive with clamav and that you can safely disregard the warning. What were the results of the virustotal scan?

Regards...
 
Old 10-14-2015, 08:28 AM   #3
sundialsvcs
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 10,253
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 3777Reputation: 3777Reputation: 3777Reputation: 3777Reputation: 3777Reputation: 3777Reputation: 3777Reputation: 3777Reputation: 3777Reputation: 3777Reputation: 3777
Also: are not the printer-driver files protected from modification by ordinary mortals such as yourself?

(You are "just an ordinary mortal," not "a big wheel," on your system, right?)

If so, then it is very likely that the message is a false-positive. It should not be possible for anyone to tamper with global system files.
 
Old 10-14-2015, 08:49 PM   #4
John VV
LQ Muse
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 17,602

Rep: Reputation: 2648Reputation: 2648Reputation: 2648Reputation: 2648Reputation: 2648Reputation: 2648Reputation: 2648Reputation: 2648Reputation: 2648Reputation: 2648Reputation: 2648
sometimes ClamAV has the new definitions a day or two BEFORE trend and norton and mcafee do

also in the past i have had clam find things that both Norton and McAfee missed
and NOT just the things they ARE PAID $$$$ TO MIS


so i take it this is a network printer with Microsoft AND Linux machines using it

while it is nearly impossible to have had the linux os's mess with it
the MS windows systems on the shared printer are easy
and a wireless printer on a windows domain is "VERY low hanging fruit" and a VERY NICE target
and a easy in for a war drive
 
Old 10-15-2015, 12:27 PM   #5
Habitual
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Abingdon, VA
Distribution: Catalina
Posts: 9,374
Blog Entries: 37

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaz2100 View Post
I have no idea how to resolve this inconsistency. Most probably, linux machines are immune. www.virustotal.com
Have you run
Code:
sudo freshclam
prior to (re-)scan?

Can you name the file exactly?
Can you post the link to the virustotal scan result?
On Windows hosts, you can also use ClamWin for scanning from that environment,
and compare results.
 
Old 10-18-2015, 02:06 AM   #6
kaz2100
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Penguin land, with apple, no gates
Distribution: SlackWare > Debian testing woody(32) sarge etch lenny squeeze(+64) wheezy .. bullseye bookworm
Posts: 1,818

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 108Reputation: 108
Hya

Thanks for your posts.

The windows machine is not connected to network. It controls some laboratory machine. (So, it is old, and unable to upgrade.)

Actual files infected and virus are:
symmpi.sys: Trojan.Rootkit-3070
write.exe: Win.Trojan.Agent-866396

When these files are scanned at www.virustotal.com, only clamav reports problem. No other ones.

I will keep my eyes open.

cheers
 
Old 10-18-2015, 02:48 AM   #7
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051
clearly windows files.
on an external hd?
are you sure this is the "active printer driver"?
active on your linux installation, or active on some other, windows installation?
if you have a windows machine running, i think it's better to check for viruses locally, not remotely - or am i misunderstanding?
are you using clamav on that windows machine without network connection?
what is this external hd???

ultimately, you have to find out where clamav's virus definitions come from, and check for the ID "Win.Trojan.Agent-905394". that will give you answers.
 
Old 10-18-2015, 04:27 AM   #8
kaz2100
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Penguin land, with apple, no gates
Distribution: SlackWare > Debian testing woody(32) sarge etch lenny squeeze(+64) wheezy .. bullseye bookworm
Posts: 1,818

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 108Reputation: 108
Hya

My log reads that freshclam goes every hour.

The machine infected is a standalone windows. All programs run with admin prev.

cheers
 
Old 10-18-2015, 03:16 PM   #9
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051
so you are using clamav for windows, and scanning an external hard drive, clamav told you that the currently running printer driver on that hard drive might be a trojan???
aren't you maybe talking about the printers setup.exe or some such?
 
Old 10-18-2015, 03:34 PM   #10
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4885Reputation: 4885Reputation: 4885Reputation: 4885Reputation: 4885Reputation: 4885Reputation: 4885Reputation: 4885Reputation: 4885Reputation: 4885Reputation: 4885
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaz2100 View Post
When these files are scanned at www.virustotal.com, only clamav reports problem. No other ones.
In that case I would ignore it as a false positive.
 
Old 10-19-2015, 02:47 AM   #11
kaz2100
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Penguin land, with apple, no gates
Distribution: SlackWare > Debian testing woody(32) sarge etch lenny squeeze(+64) wheezy .. bullseye bookworm
Posts: 1,818

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 108Reputation: 108
Hya,

Probably, my explanation was insufficient.

I took a disk drive from stand alone windows machine. I connected the drive to linux machine via USB, so it is recognized as an external drive.
The disk serves as drive C on the windows machine.
Clamav detects several files, which are printer driver related.

It is a long story hiding behind.
Somebody introduced a malware to the machine by using an infected USB stick. (This malware is detected by all virus programs.)
After removing that malware, I checked entire system as described above. Then I ran into this inconsistency problem.

cheers
 
Old 10-20-2015, 01:07 AM   #12
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051Reputation: 6051
ok, i understand better now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaz2100 View Post
Clamav detects several files, which are printer driver related.
it shouldn't be too hard to securely delete those files, uninstall the printer driver, then reinstall from a secure source, then rescan?
 
Old 10-25-2015, 08:52 PM   #13
kaz2100
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Penguin land, with apple, no gates
Distribution: SlackWare > Debian testing woody(32) sarge etch lenny squeeze(+64) wheezy .. bullseye bookworm
Posts: 1,818

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 108Reputation: 108
Hya,

Thank you for your suggestions.

Currently, the windows one is running. At next reboot, I will try all suggestions.

cheers
 
Old 12-21-2015, 06:12 PM   #14
kaz2100
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Penguin land, with apple, no gates
Distribution: SlackWare > Debian testing woody(32) sarge etch lenny squeeze(+64) wheezy .. bullseye bookworm
Posts: 1,818

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 108Reputation: 108
Hya,

I checked these disks with clamav this week.

Alas, drivers were clean. ?!?

I will leave them as is.

Thanks

cheers
 
Old 12-21-2015, 07:50 PM   #15
Steven_G
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2015
Location: Western US
Distribution: Home spun
Posts: 142

Rep: Reputation: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaz2100 View Post
Hya,

Probably, my explanation was insufficient.

I took a disk drive from stand alone windows machine. I connected the drive to linux machine via USB, so it is recognized as an external drive.
The disk serves as drive C on the windows machine.
Clamav detects several files, which are printer driver related.

It is a long story hiding behind.
Somebody introduced a malware to the machine by using an infected USB stick. (This malware is detected by all virus programs.)
After removing that malware, I checked entire system as described above. Then I ran into this inconsistency problem.

cheers
Well, it's your machine, handle it how you see fit. But, I was a vendor / tech support for MS on the MS network for MS employees and partners. And I can tell you that in situations like this their internal policy is to not trust *any* virus scanner or repair tool; not even their own. By policy, any machine with any trace of any class of malware on it *must* be flattened and reimaged before being reconnected to the network and no data is allowed to be recovered from the infected drive. And they were serious enough about it that it was a terminable offence.
 
  


Reply

Tags
clamav, inconsistency, trojan horse, virus


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows virus detection in Linux Vermont1 General 6 01-16-2012 11:41 AM
POP SMTP Virus and Spam detection firewall netguy2000 Linux - Server 3 08-25-2007 11:18 AM
Inconsistent detection of USB Memory Wicked Wizard MEPIS 8 05-11-2006 10:27 PM
IDS/Virus Detection Matir Linux - Security 2 01-28-2005 03:42 PM
Virus detection reported during booting jfchui Linspire/Freespire 1 03-26-2004 05:12 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration