Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
01-10-2009, 03:02 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2008
Distribution: Fedora 10, Ubuntu 8.10, CentOS 4.4
Posts: 20
Rep:
|
VirtualBox 2.1 on Fedora 64-bit won't install Windows 7 Beta 64-bit
I just downloaded the Windows 7 Public Beta 64-bit. I am running Fedora 10 64-bit with VirtualBox 64-bit version. When I try to install Win7 from the .iso, I get an error that says:
"Attempting to load a 64-bit application, however this CPU is not compatible with 64-bit mode."
This is bogus because VT-x is enabled in VirtualBox for this vm.
Has anyone installed 64-bit Vista (and/or the Win7 beta) with VirtualBox successfully?
|
|
|
01-10-2009, 05:27 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2009
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
Nope, didn't work here either. This was tried on an Ubuntu 8.10 x64 install running on a Xeon quad-core with 16G ram. Using Virtualbox 2.1.
Different problem though, in this case it complained that there was a hardware error. Hitting F8 got to the typical advanced options, and not even plain old safe mode would work. They all spat up
Status: 0xc0000225
<edit: had status code wrong>
D.
Last edited by Halfwalker; 01-10-2009 at 06:18 PM.
|
|
|
01-10-2009, 05:37 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2008
Distribution: Fedora 10, Ubuntu 8.10, CentOS 4.4
Posts: 20
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halfwalker
Nope, didn't work here either. This was tried on an Ubuntu 8.10 x64 install running on a Xeon quad-core with 16G ram. Using Virtualbox 2.1.
|
I'm going to try VMWare Server and see if it works with that.
|
|
|
01-11-2009, 09:29 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2008
Distribution: Fedora 10, Ubuntu 8.10, CentOS 4.4
Posts: 20
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Has anyone else gotten the Windows 7 Beta x64 to run under a 64-bit Linux host with VirtualBox? I have been holding off on installing VMWare Server, because VirtualBox has a much smaller footprint and is all I otherwise really need. I'd like to get Win7Beta x64 running with VBox if possible.
|
|
|
01-11-2009, 03:30 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 25
Rep:
|
I was getting Status: 0xc0000225 on intrepid 64-bit then I enabled both IO APIC and PAE/NX (basically all options on now) and Windows 7 beta 64bit is installing now. I didn't go through and test which option was truly needed, but my guess would be the IO APIC option did it over the other.
EDIT: I dunno if it matters this early in testing but i also had enabled the sata controller option as well
Last edited by dblade; 01-11-2009 at 03:33 PM.
|
|
|
01-11-2009, 05:19 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: FreeBSD, OpenSuse, Ubuntu, RHEL
Posts: 417
Rep:
|
Firstly, I'd like to take this opportunity to curse Microsoft. I had to go to the html source and manually copy/paste the download url because of their queer ActiveX download manager. I also noticed when they asked me what my primary operating system was, there was only options for Windows and other. Gasp, you mean, actually, there is another operating system besides Winblows?
That aside, it's now downloading, and I look forward to seeing just how many obstacles Microsoft has devised to keep 7 from running virtualized.
|
|
|
01-11-2009, 05:20 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: FreeBSD, OpenSuse, Ubuntu, RHEL
Posts: 417
Rep:
|
Double post deleted.
|
|
|
01-12-2009, 07:39 PM
|
#8
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2008
Distribution: Fedora 10, Ubuntu 8.10, CentOS 4.4
Posts: 20
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dblade
I was getting Status: 0xc0000225 on intrepid 64-bit then I enabled both IO APIC and PAE/NX (basically all options on now) and Windows 7 beta 64bit is installing now. I didn't go through and test which option was truly needed, but my guess would be the IO APIC option did it over the other.
EDIT: I dunno if it matters this early in testing but i also had enabled the sata controller option as well
|
Thanks for the input. I enabled all options and I still get the same error as I reported above. I guess I'll try downloading the 32-bit version and see if that works.
|
|
|
01-13-2009, 09:15 AM
|
#9
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2009
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dblade
I was getting Status: 0xc0000225 on intrepid 64-bit then I enabled both IO APIC and PAE/NX (basically all options on now) and Windows 7 beta 64bit is installing now. I didn't go through and test which option was truly needed, but my guess would be the IO APIC option did it over the other.
EDIT: I dunno if it matters this early in testing but i also had enabled the sata controller option as well
|
Bingo, IO APIC was it. I just enabled that and booted from the x64 dvd image. Win7 installed just fine and is running cleanly now, with the VirtualBox 2.1 Guest Additions. I normally have IO APIC disabled, as it does impact performance noticeably.
I also use the sata controller - better performance.
Oddly enough, Debian and Ubuntu x64 install and run just fine without IO APIC enabled.
BTW, in order to install the Guest Additions, you have to right-click on the installer file on the disc image, Properties, Compatibility tab, and select Windows Vista. Drops right in then and works fine.
D.
|
|
|
01-13-2009, 02:18 PM
|
#10
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2008
Distribution: Fedora 10, Ubuntu 8.10, CentOS 4.4
Posts: 20
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halfwalker
Bingo, IO APIC was it. I just enabled that and booted from the x64 dvd image. Win7 installed just fine and is running cleanly now, with the VirtualBox 2.1 Guest Additions. I normally have IO APIC disabled, as it does impact performance noticeably.
I also use the sata controller - better performance.
Oddly enough, Debian and Ubuntu x64 install and run just fine without IO APIC enabled.
BTW, in order to install the Guest Additions, you have to right-click on the installer file on the disc image, Properties, Compatibility tab, and select Windows Vista. Drops right in then and works fine.
D.
|
Halfwalker,
I enabled IO APIC and PAE/NX and it did not work for me. I'm running Fedora, not Ubuntu, so I wonder if it's something with my distro?
|
|
|
01-13-2009, 03:54 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: FreeBSD, OpenSuse, Ubuntu, RHEL
Posts: 417
Rep:
|
Works on OpenSuse. You do not need PAE/NX.
|
|
|
01-13-2009, 05:04 PM
|
#12
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2008
Distribution: Fedora 10, Ubuntu 8.10, CentOS 4.4
Posts: 20
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcookeman
Works on OpenSuse. You do not need PAE/NX.
|
Ok, so what specific settings are you using to get the install to work? Just IP APIC and SATA?
|
|
|
01-13-2009, 05:30 PM
|
#13
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: FreeBSD, OpenSuse, Ubuntu, RHEL
Posts: 417
Rep:
|
Name
Windows-7
OS Type
Windows Vista (64 bit)
Base Memory
1024 MB
Video Memory
64 MB
Boot Order
Floppy, CD/DVD-ROM, Hard Disk
ACPI
Enabled
IO APIC
Enabled
VT-x/AMD-V
Enabled
PAE/NX
Disabled
3D Acceleration
Enabled
Enable SATAController
Disabled
|
|
|
01-13-2009, 08:15 PM
|
#14
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2008
Distribution: Fedora 10, Ubuntu 8.10, CentOS 4.4
Posts: 20
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcookeman
Name
Windows-7
OS Type
Windows Vista (64 bit)
Base Memory
1024 MB
Video Memory
64 MB
Boot Order
Floppy, CD/DVD-ROM, Hard Disk
ACPI
Enabled
IO APIC
Enabled
VT-x/AMD-V
Enabled
PAE/NX
Disabled
3D Acceleration
Enabled
Enable SATAController
Disabled
|
I replicated those same settings and still get the error. I'm going to try to download the 32-bit version. Every time I try, it "completes" prematurely (the resulting file isn't anywhere near 2.4GB, like it says it should be).
Last edited by linuxroks88; 01-13-2009 at 08:18 PM.
|
|
|
01-14-2009, 12:17 AM
|
#15
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 25
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halfwalker
Oddly enough, Debian and Ubuntu x64 install and run just fine without IO APIC enabled.
|
It may be useful to diff the kernel .config 's to see how APIC and related settings are set between the two.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|