Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The TIFF that is generated by Microsoft Office Document Scanning is not a proper TIFF. It appears that it Microsoft has decided to use TIFF as a container itself (for a JPEG, it turns out!). This is against the TIFF standard, rendering the TIFF file useless to anything but Microsoft Office Document Imaging, as far as I can tell. Of course, I don't have Microsoft Office 2003, so I don't know. I do know that I've tried to open these files using the Microsoft TIFF viewer on Windows XP to no avail.
He recommends using a program called foremost with
I was thinking as much as soon as I read your first post. In my experience, a problem opening ALL files usually means that the reading program has bugs, but problems with only specified files generally means that the generating program did something non-standard. That, or the file is simply corrupt.
This is doubly-true when it comes to Microsoft. You should never expect their programs to generate standard anything.
Even so, I'm surprised to read just how blatantly non-standard their tiff generation actually is. Even their own products can't handle the garbage they produce, and you have to use a data recovery program to extract anything usable. Pathetic.
This is doubly-true when it comes to Microsoft. You should never expect their programs to generate standard anything.
M$ actually calls the blatant breaking of standards "value add", where they "add features" and you must use their software to "take advantage" of the "improved features".
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.