Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I don't even know if this applies to any disro, but maybe I'll get a few responses from this question. Are there any distros that seem to be heavier on resources than others? I know it depends on what services are running, but taking into account only the essential services needed and other things which I don't know about since I've only been using linux for a couple weeks.
It's a symptom of distros but only because as you say it depends on what is installed. Typically heavier distros use Gnome or KDE. Comparing distros is not really the problem. Some distros make it easier to install lean system than others though.
For example, with Debian you can install a text system that takes up only 400MB of hard disk space and 20MB of RAM. Then you can build your system from the ground up using aptitude install x-window-system-core icewm (or kdebase for a lighter KDE). But you have to take the time to install everything you want when you need it.
As you said, it depends what software you are running. Not just services, but desktop environment is also a major factor if you're using the machine as a desktop. KDE and Gnome are a lot heavier than XFCE and others.
It goes a little deeper than which software you run. The kernel can be set up in such a way as to reduct latency for some types of apps (usually focused on GUIs). There is a penalty for this though, usually in terms to dealing with server loads. Depending on the emphasis of your distro, the kernel which ships with the default install will be optimised for different things.
As you said, it depends what software you are running. Not just services, but desktop environment is also a major factor if you're using the machine as a desktop. KDE and Gnome are a lot heavier than XFCE and others.
It goes a little deeper than which software you run. The kernel can be set up in such a way as to reduct latency for some types of apps (usually focused on GUIs). There is a penalty for this though, usually in terms to dealing with server loads. Depending on the emphasis of your distro, the kernel which ships with the default install will be optimised for different things.
Well, I had the crazy idea of kinda building my own distro sort of, but I'm not such a techie as to build it from scratch. Maybe you guys can help with a starting point ot something. I'm only using my computer for a lot of web surfing and some occasional audio and image editing. I'm also storing all my audio and image files on my hard drive. If switching desktop environment will lessen the load, then I'm all for it and I'll start from there. Maybe a distro that has XFCE or others as a default?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.