LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-21-2010, 02:21 PM   #1
floppy_stuttgart
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Debian like
Posts: 813
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 76
SWAP and Linux on the same HDD is quicker than on different HDDs ?


Hello There,

I want to install antiX on my Win98 hda (HDD).
I have already installed TinyCoreLinux on hdb (boot + linuxFiles + swap).
Should I install a new swap for antiX on the hda or is it still ok if I use the swap of hdb?
Perhaps the question in another way: is an additional swap on hda perhaps quicker than the access on the hdb swap?

Any recommendations are welcome.

Pascal
 
Old 12-21-2010, 03:04 PM   #2
ronlau9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: In front of my LINUX OR MAC BOX
Distribution: Mandriva 2009 X86_64 suse 11.3 X86_64 Centos X86_64 Debian X86_64 Linux MInt 86_64 OS X
Posts: 2,369

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
You can use the same swap file as long as do not hibernate .
I do not think that its quicker to use separate swap files for each distro .
Any how personally I did not find any difference in speed
 
Old 12-21-2010, 03:58 PM   #3
paulsm4
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: SusE 8.2
Posts: 5,863
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Hi -

If you were running 1980's class unix servers with SCSI drives - then maybe splitting swap over two drives might have made sense.

But for an IDE drive on a PC: no way. Just define a swap drive anyplace that's convenient for you: there is NO performance gain one way or the other.

PS:
If you find yourself using swap at ALL during normal operations, that's definitely a "yellow flag" that you probably need more RAM!
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-06-2011, 02:46 PM   #4
floppy_stuttgart
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Debian like
Posts: 813

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 76
closing

swap = bad.
Swap over ata33 is worser than over ata66.
So, I wiull move my swap to the quickest drive (ata66) and will increase the RAM if its used! (or use smaller distro for not using the swap).
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hot Swap SATA vs. USB HDDs slacky Linux - Hardware 3 08-30-2010 03:03 PM
swap space on a second HDD pmetzak Linux - Hardware 2 09-22-2006 01:47 AM
added HDD in linux services failed to turn on swap krishna_kawhale Linux - Server 3 08-09-2006 11:58 PM
Swap on new HDD MoonlitSky Fedora 3 07-25-2006 01:10 AM
Accessing other HDDs/Booting from other HDDs Namatacka Ubuntu 2 05-07-2006 12:21 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration