LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-03-2004, 06:13 AM   #1
ieuuk
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: England, United kingdom
Distribution: Fedora 10 + Cent OS 5.3
Posts: 65

Rep: Reputation: 15
Slackware or Suse


Hi, at the moment i run my home server on mandrake because i heard it was really easy to set up, and using it as a desktop is great but it just doesnt like being a server.

My server is only a 450 p3 with 640mb of mem but it works fairly well.

But what i want to do is to change from mandrake, its not really designed for what i use it for, so i was then looking through the lq iso's and saw that slackware and suse are both popular and designed to be used as servers but i was wondering which to go for.
They both appear to have their pro's and cons.

Any advice would be great. Thankyou
 
Old 10-03-2004, 06:28 AM   #2
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475
Mandrake should be fine as a file/print/gateway server (which is what I guess you are using it for). When you say "...it just doesnt like being a server" what do you mean? If it seems slow, try removing all the gui options - you don't need a gui on a server (are you listening Microsoft? )

If you really need to go with a different distro, SuSE will be equally as slow as Mandrake and Slackware (while fast) will take a lot of setting up.

Personally, I think you (and maybe we) would learn more from trying to improve your current set up - so what problems are you having?
 
Old 10-03-2004, 07:18 AM   #3
ieuuk
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: England, United kingdom
Distribution: Fedora 10 + Cent OS 5.3
Posts: 65

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
its a bit sluggish.
i use it for file, print, webserver, and mysql

It doesnt appear to let go of memory, when its just booted up and is sitting there its only using bout 100mb of mem but now its been running for about 5hours its using nearly 300 - 400mb of mem, and i dont have a lot of it to start with, and thats before i start running any vnc sessions. i was thinking of turning off the gui things cos i only really use webmin and telnet to adjust the settings etc

Its also got a weird habbit of just hanging, it dissapears of the network and i have to go and press the reset button but i cant find anything in the logs which says whats wrong.
 
Old 10-03-2004, 09:10 AM   #4
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475
Sounds like you have unnecessary services running. Open a console and run top and see what is running. If you have a gui, close it down, using the termnal only is all you need for a server. What sort of security do you have on the box? If it's connected to the internet you'll need firewalling and an IDS. Head over to the Security forum and read up on the links posted by Unspawn.
 
Old 10-03-2004, 09:19 AM   #5
ieuuk
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: England, United kingdom
Distribution: Fedora 10 + Cent OS 5.3
Posts: 65

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
i have the security set to the minimal settings because i find it does funny things to remote access and file sharing etc.

I have a firewall in my router which is set to air tight apart from the webserver port coming in.

I think im going to give slackware a try on a spare hdd and see what its like.

Only thing which worrys me about it is it doesnt support rpm packages but im sure i'll be able to install webmin on it
 
Old 10-03-2004, 09:22 AM   #6
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475
Rpms are supported by Slackware. You also have the rpm2tgz converter to turn rpms into tgz files.
 
Old 10-03-2004, 09:31 AM   #7
ieuuk
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: England, United kingdom
Distribution: Fedora 10 + Cent OS 5.3
Posts: 65

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... they dont make that obvious on the website, thanks :-D
 
Old 10-03-2004, 09:52 AM   #8
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475
The rpm package still says "unsupported" when you see it in the install - but it's said that for a while AFAIK and I don't think anyone has had problems with it.
 
Old 10-03-2004, 09:54 AM   #9
ieuuk
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: England, United kingdom
Distribution: Fedora 10 + Cent OS 5.3
Posts: 65

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
thanks for that, i'll download it tonight and give it a try at some point
 
Old 10-03-2004, 09:06 PM   #10
reddazz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 77
I use Slackware and you have to realise that not all rpms will work on Slackware and there are very few GUI tools to configure your system, so you got to be comfortable with editing configuration files manually if you want to run Slack.
 
Old 10-04-2004, 09:58 AM   #11
ieuuk
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: England, United kingdom
Distribution: Fedora 10 + Cent OS 5.3
Posts: 65

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
That sounds ok, im pretty happy with doing that. I've ordered a new network card for my comp so that linux will dhcp it to my router which will save me about an hour trying to get it to work.

Thanks for all your help
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SuSE 9.2 Pro vs. Slackware 10.0 GATTACA Slackware 17 04-22-2005 03:23 PM
SuSE 9.0 and Slackware 9.1, Let's make SuSE fast as Slack vdogvictor Linux - General 2 06-19-2004 03:54 PM
Slackware 9.1 or SuSE 9.1? nealkochhar Linux - Software 7 06-09-2004 12:26 AM
Slackware and SuSE devit Linux - Distributions 3 03-07-2004 07:22 PM
SuSE or Slackware? Huddlebum Linux - Distributions 4 11-16-2003 10:05 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration