Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm trying to share files back and forth between an windoze 2k machine and my FedoraCore machine. I'm curious which one works better for what I'm trying to accomplish.
From what I understand NFS is for *nix to *nix and Samba is for *nix to Windows. So essentially you may need both on the same network if you want a directory to be shared to both operating systems.
If you want to share with windows you will need to install Samba.
You can also use Samba to share with other Linux machines without any problem (mount the shares as smbfs in fstab).
Although you can use both, I would suggest you use Samba to handle all your shares to both *nix and windows clients. You will save alot of time this way as you only need to set up and map one set of shares.
There should be plenty of info on the forum about how to set up your samba config.
Depending on what you try to accomplish, samba is the choice. But if you need to move around large files, ftp might be a better choice, it's a lot faster, but only for large files. Samba will do fine with small files.
my experience tells me that nfs is (much) faster than samba.
For example:
I have tested datatransfer (700meg) from one pc to another through a powerline connection...
here i have 2 normal realtec pci 100 mbit cards which are connected to the powerplug...
the theoretically datatransfer is 14 mbit...
but because of the length i get much lower datarates...
ok now th tests:
Linux to Linux
Samba: ca. 320kbyte (=2560kbit)
NFS : ca. 530kbyte (=4240kbit)
the only bad thing is that i get very often "timeout" problems when i want to connect my nfs-paths in the /etc/fstab... :-(
So i have to mount maually.....
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.