Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
02-23-2009, 04:04 AM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: fasdf
Distribution: Debian / Suse /RHEL
Posts: 1,130
Rep:
|
Samba mount problem
I have a bebian and RHEL 5 server , I use the command mount.cifs windows-path local-path -o username="xxxx",password="yyyy" can mount the windows path as local path , but I use the same method to do at a RHEL 3 server , it pop the below messages
mount error: cifs filesystem not supported by the system
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs)
Can advise what is the problem , how can I fix it ? thx
|
|
|
02-23-2009, 04:08 AM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417
|
rhel3 still used smbfs, not cifs.
|
|
|
02-23-2009, 04:36 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: fasdf
Distribution: Debian / Suse /RHEL
Posts: 1,130
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by acid_kewpie
rhel3 still used smbfs, not cifs.
|
thx reply ,
can advise if I really want to use cifs type , what can I do ?
The reason of why I want to use cifs is because some other application use cifs for file sharing , I am not perfer to make too much changes.
Thx
|
|
|
02-23-2009, 05:07 AM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417
|
I gues you could upgrade the kernel to get cifs installed too, but if you're just mounting it, i really can't see any issue using smbfs over cifs.
|
|
|
02-24-2009, 03:19 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: fasdf
Distribution: Debian / Suse /RHEL
Posts: 1,130
Original Poster
Rep:
|
thx reply,
I found that there is packages called cifs client , can advise does it used for cifs connection if the kernel not support cifs ? is it suit for my case if I do not upgrade the kernel ? thx
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|