RPM vs compiled source
Hello, I was wondering what is the main difference between installing an RPM and compiling a source code. I noticed that when you istall an RPM it checks for "dependencies" and stuff like that, while compiled sources you don't need dependencies?
Im confused. For the same progra, why don't both have dependencies... :scratch: |
Re: RPM vs compiled source
Quote:
When compiling from source, it can fail when running ./configure but even when its checking, if it doesn't find something it needs, it doesn't always error out but maybe later down the road when you try to run the app or such. Just all depends on what your installing. |
Re: Re: RPM vs compiled source
Aaah interestng :)
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 AM. |