Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
06-13-2002, 07:10 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 163
Rep:
|
Rpm Lib version conflict
Hello
I tried installing Red Hat Linux 6.2's updated packages Pine,Zlib etc.Since the packages that were installed during Red Hat's installation had some vulnerabilty.Red hat Errata had given these updated packages.But when i tried to install the updated packages it said that these packages needed
rpmlib<=4.0-1 is needed.Does it mean that RPM engine has to be updated.What shall i do
Regards
Saravanan
|
|
|
06-13-2002, 07:22 AM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417
|
yes it does.
|
|
|
06-13-2002, 07:41 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 163
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Chris
You have given a reply ,reading which i get nothing into my head.Can u give me a clearer explanation
|
|
|
06-13-2002, 08:01 AM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417
|
Does it mean that RPM engine has to be updated? yes it does. go to rpmfind and get newer rpms for the rpm library itself.
better?
|
|
|
06-14-2002, 08:36 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: California
Distribution: Red Hat
Posts: 402
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by acid_kewpie
better?
|
hahahaha.....acid, u know something?
i like to read your replies to most of the threads or posts. You are a, but a bit of sarcastic sometimes....i really enjoy reading your posts
|
|
|
06-14-2002, 08:59 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 163
Original Poster
Rep:
|
U have payed a haeavy price for ur sicausticness.Now i am boiling under pressure.I uninstalled the existing version of RPM in my machine thinking that i could get the binaries for RPMS and restore everything but i was not able to do that.Plz we come to this site to learn if u expreinced person feel our questions are silly just ignore them rather than giving misleading replies.Know i am at my wits struggling to get things up,for the simple reasin there is no source available for RPMS 4.0.x..
|
|
|
06-14-2002, 09:24 AM
|
#7
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417
|
i'm sorry i didn't mean to sound sarcastic. in your post you asked one actual question, to which i answered "yes". i don't really see that as misleading....
Also erm.. a heavy price? i'm totally lost now....
peace 
|
|
|
06-14-2002, 09:32 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: California
Distribution: Red Hat
Posts: 402
Rep:
|
|
|
|
06-14-2002, 09:37 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: California
Distribution: Red Hat
Posts: 402
Rep:
|
I am sorry, maybe i should not have used the word power, sarcastic.
I should describe that Acid has a good sense of humour, which pretty draw me to stick reading his posts.
And myself find reading his posts entertaining.
No offence, no 'trolling'..........
peace
|
|
|
06-15-2002, 01:19 AM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 163
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Ok everything is fine.If u could help me out with my problem i will be happy
|
|
|
06-15-2002, 01:30 AM
|
#11
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Distribution: *NIX
Posts: 3,704
Rep:
|
So did the rpm2tgz work? If so then get rpm-4.x.x.rpm and a development one and convert them to tarballs, install from tarballs and then you can use rpm database to store packages info, etc.
|
|
|
06-15-2002, 01:45 AM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 163
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I haven't tried yet,I am just engaged with some coding work(basically i am a PHP programmer,sice there are no sysadmin in my office i take care of my server also).I was normally considered as not being adventourous,with regards to the server handling.SO in the past 2 days i attempted few adventourous things and ran into problems,,once i install i will get back to u.I can never forget ur help
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|