Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I moved this over here since it probably fits better heh.
Hi LinuxQuestions.org !!
Well now that I'm installed and everything is going smooth, I've decided on a couple of things and wanted to get some opinion on the direction that I'm deciding to take my machine.
Right now I have the following when I execute a df command.
What I'd like to do if possible is change it to a different set up so instead of having all 418 gb be on one filesystem. Break it up into different sectors for different stuff. Such as
The computer itself has 4 x 146 gb hard drives but RH was preloaded when the machine came from Dell. I'd really want to be able to set it up so I can have room for backups and space it out better. If anyone can give me some advice on the best structuring or some examples of maybe what you would do, it'd be greatly appreciated.
Now the strucutre you see above, may not be the best format or layout. I'm open to hearing some other possible layouts but the main area I'm interested in is learning how to change the one huge block of space (the 4 drives), into more consolidated filesystems.
Second question I had was, I currently have a box that uses Grub to Dual Boot Windows XP and RH9. I've considered using partition magic again to increase the amount of space I partioned for Linux and reducing the amount I had for XP. Since I'm using RH more and more and XP less and less. Would this be safe to do using Partiion Magic. It seems like it would be but just because it sounds simple doesnt mean it would resolve simple. If anyone has any opinoins on this too , I'm all ears.
Thank you in advance for any advice or suggestiosn.
Well, I think the best way to repartition (and with those harddrives, I suggest this) is to reformat linux and start over from scratch.
You can leave your Windows partitions in place.
Yes, splitting up into multiple partitions is VERY smart. Here's my suggestion:
/home - give it its own drive. You will use this for storing settings, and all 'personal' data, like Video,music,documents, etc.
/ - Give it its own drive. This is where most of the file system is.
SWAP partition, stick this as the FIRST partition on one of your drives,but not where "/" is. Making it first makes the system much faster (10-15%). Make this like 500-700MB.
Now, you can devote a drive to the 'little' things, like:
a /tmp partition, maybe 1GB (often CD burning is stored here, and that can be 700MB in one go).
/var if you want to. This stores logs and spools, not too much here, not a big deal unless you run a server.
NOW:
Then devote whatevers left to "backup".
Alternatively, you can store all this in HOME, so you only have to backup one folder.
I also suggest making maybe a 3-5GB FAT32 partition, since you can use this to share between WINDOWS and LINUX.
Also, you can leave a drive empty if you wont be using it for a while, and store partition IMAGES on it, which is the best form of backup.
Lastly, as a file system, I recommend REISERFS. Its faster, more space efficient, and more stable (In my opinion).
But as the minimum, use EXT3 (not ext2), you want file journaling.
Last edited by contrasutra; 10-02-2003 at 06:23 PM.
The computer isnt running windows. The 2nd computer I was talking about in question #2 is different from the the computer in my frist question. So leaving the windows partition isnt really an option. Since this computer came configured from Dell, I'm afraid to reformat because god know what they did in setting it up. I'm sorta left to having to fix what they sent.
I just dont like having that one monster filesystem heh.
See I'm not all that RAID knowledgeable to begin with, but I have done some reading on it from google.
I know it is RAID cause I see it load up in BIOS when the computer is booting up. So that brings up the question, does this affect how I make the filesystems off that one big drive. What does it impact now and what does it affect in terms of what I want to do.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.