LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-30-2014, 04:58 PM   #1
haertig
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, LinuxMint, Slackware, SysrescueCD, Raspbian, Arch
Posts: 2,331

Rep: Reputation: 357Reputation: 357Reputation: 357Reputation: 357
Question: Looking for your experiences on setting up NAS, media server, etc.


I'm looking for examples of people's setups for sharing. By "sharing" I'm talking about functions like "NAS", "File Server", "Media Server", "Backup Server", "Cloud", etc.

I'm currently set up with a Linux box acting as a file server (Samba). This same box also servers as a backup server for my other home computers. And on another Linux box I have a media server (Plex Media Server). This second server also contains all the video/audio/etc. media that it serves up (this data is currently not on the file server, only on the Plex server, so kind of a mis-mash of data storage). These different boxes are all accessible from my LAN. What I would like to do is expand that to external network access from a variety of devices (Android phones, iPads, laptops, etc.) for streaming video and file access, while still maintaining good security security.

I'm just wondering what people's experiences have been with things like FreeNAS, OwnCloud, Plex, etc. in setting up something like this. For example FreeNAS has a Plex plug-in. What are the pluses/minues of using that as opposed to a stand-alone Plex install? What about OwnCloud? What does that gain you vs. some other solution? Are people setting these things up in separate virtual machines to encapsulate functions, or as on "do all" system?

There are many different ways to procede. I'm just wondering what people's experiences have been on one path vs. another. I'm thinking of setting up a NAS on it's own box, and then having a separate server running VM's holding things like OwnCloud, Plex, etc. (each in their own VM possibly) and these apps accessing their data from the NAS. Any ideas or suggestions on a better way to do this? Alternate ideas for implementation?
 
Old 07-30-2014, 06:41 PM   #2
lleb
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Distribution: CentOS/Fedora/Pop!_OS
Posts: 2,983

Rep: Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551
while im not going to address all of your questions ill fill you in on what i do here at my house. sounds a lot like what you looking to do.



1. CentOS 6.x server
2. NFS for media sharing
3. PlexMediaServer
4. Backup storage
5. F@H SSMA F@H Team
6. Minecraft server

I dont personally run OpenCloud, but have it running on an other server that is a bit more powerful then mine. just has more RAM and faster HDDs then my personal server. OwnCloud is a mega resource hog, but man its brilliant if you have the horse power behind it.

I run all 5 of those services off of a single system. its an AND FX6350 with 8G RAM currently running a combination of sATA II and III drives. Im about to upgrade the HDDs to add sATA III drives and place them into a RAID of some type, to be determined.

If you have the hardware spreading the services out to separate hardwares would be ideal, but meh its just for my family. i dont need 3 or 4 "servers" running around my house.

I have at the most 7 connections to my server streaming media with ZERO issues with only about 1/2 being wired 10/100/1000 and the rest of a dual n-band wifi router.

just a side note, i had to create a script + cron job that runs every 15 min. to clear out the cache and free up the excess RAM that F@H tends to eat to improve streaming quality otherwise the audio would get out of sync when F@H was eating up to much RAM. That will be fixed in my next upgrade for the server when I drastically increase the RAM of the server.

hope that gives you a bit of insight. i know its not exactly what you were looking for, but it should be a start.

Last edited by lleb; 07-30-2014 at 06:44 PM.
 
Old 07-30-2014, 07:39 PM   #3
haertig
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, LinuxMint, Slackware, SysrescueCD, Raspbian, Arch
Posts: 2,331

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 357Reputation: 357Reputation: 357Reputation: 357
thanks for the info.

If your AMD FX6350 with 8G ram system won't run OwnCloud well, then my AMD Phenom II X6 1045T with 4Gb ram system certainly won't (both are 6 core CPUs, mine being an older generation). Your CPU is about 16% higher performance on average per an online comparison I found ( http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/329..._X6_1045T.html ). Plus, you have twice the memory that I do.

OwnCloud must be a real resource hog, as you say! I'm surprised it is so bad. I've found my current CPU has no problems keeping up with downloading large amounts of data, transcoding video, and streaming an HD video (via Plex Media Server) to my Roku all independantly but at the same time. I did run an OwnCloud test in a VM a while back (downloaded the image and ran it under VirtualBox). It seemed to work OK, but I didn't stress it or look to see how many resources it was consuming. I just fired it up and basically determined that "it worked".
 
Old 07-30-2014, 09:10 PM   #4
lleb
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Distribution: CentOS/Fedora/Pop!_OS
Posts: 2,983

Rep: Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551
well its heavy when you are sharing files. for some reason instead of just changing/modifying permissions to the file stored it makes a copy of those files into the other uses directory. thats what makes it so heavy. for just calendar, personal file storage, and things like that its amazing.

also keep in mind F@H uses 99% of all 6 of my cores.

if owncloud was the only thing i ran on the server it would be fine. i could even keep the NFS share running knowing that the bottleneck would be when a user is accessing shared files for the first time.

after all it is a cloud based service. it is designed to be used in and on hardware that one would find in a cloud. so multi-CPU with max or near max RAM per CPU, not just core with 10k - 15k rpm RAIDed arrays.

Last edited by lleb; 07-30-2014 at 09:12 PM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Need help setting up a media server xjonquilx Linux - Networking 1 06-27-2012 02:50 PM
Want to build a linux based nas/media streaming server bldgengineer Linux - Server 5 07-27-2011 11:17 AM
setting up Media Server Millenniumman Linux - Hardware 1 04-16-2006 07:32 AM
LXer: Nas/media server reference platform runs Linux LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-16-2006 05:21 AM
What distro should i use in setting-up a media-server? engkeboy Linux - Newbie 4 12-04-2005 09:12 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration