Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
06-07-2014, 08:16 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2014
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux 7.5 (wheezy)
Posts: 258
Rep:
|
Problem with identical programs
I installed a packaged postfix on a server and it installed OpenSSL-1.0.1e along with it. OpenSSL-1.0.1e doesn't have RSA capabilities, so I installed OpenSSL-1.0.1g. I thought that the old openssl would be replaced, but the server now has both of them. When I do an 'openssl version', it shows OpenSSL-1.0.1e. Is there some file in Linux that determines what the dominant program is supposed to be? I have a program that needs to find OpenSSL-1.0.1g to perform RSA operations. There is no way that the program can be selective within itself.
|
|
|
06-08-2014, 10:50 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: RHELtopia....
Distribution: Solaris 11.2/Slackware/RHEL/
Posts: 1,491
Rep:
|
Quote:
Is there some file in Linux that determines what the dominant program is supposed to be?
|
$PATH
But that's not what you really want to know.
Quote:
There is no way that the program can be selective within itself.
|
$something > /path/to/binary_version_you_want
That might work
Or you could just uninstall version 1e
Last edited by dijetlo; 06-08-2014 at 10:52 AM.
|
|
|
06-08-2014, 12:12 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2014
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux 7.5 (wheezy)
Posts: 258
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks. I am afraid that the program using 1e might not function if it is uninstalled. I am going to experiment with installing 1g or h before installing postfix and see if postfix uses it or installs 1e anyway.
|
|
|
06-08-2014, 12:26 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: RHELtopia....
Distribution: Solaris 11.2/Slackware/RHEL/
Posts: 1,491
Rep:
|
Quote:
I am afraid that the program using 1e might not function if it is uninstalled.
|
Try it and see.
I have a feeling you'll be pleasantly surprised and if not, you can re-install it.
Just make sure you've downloaded everything you need for the rollback before you do, just in case.
|
|
|
06-08-2014, 12:38 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2014
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux 7.5 (wheezy)
Posts: 258
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Can't take a chance on it. If this program stops working, people around the world are going to be upset. I have found that thing seem to be running ok without 0.1g being the predominate program. Apparently the other program is finding 0.1g itself and generating the RSA key correctly.
|
|
|
06-08-2014, 03:04 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: RHELtopia....
Distribution: Solaris 11.2/Slackware/RHEL/
Posts: 1,491
Rep:
|
Just a suggestion, but the first thing I do when I get somewhere is build a test environment. I'd think the sheer terror of making changes on live servers without being absolutely certain of the result I'm about to get would send me to an early grave.
|
|
|
06-08-2014, 04:09 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2014
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux 7.5 (wheezy)
Posts: 258
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dijetlo
Just a suggestion, but the first thing I do when I get somewhere is build a test environment. I'd think the sheer terror of making changes on live servers without being absolutely certain of the result I'm about to get would send me to an early grave.
|
Yes, good advice. A fellow once asked me how I seemed to keep out of trouble with management, while everyone else, including himself, got chewed out for mistakes from time to time. I told him that one's goal in any company should always be to continuously cover your a%# from every possible problem that might come up, to keep yourself out of trouble.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|