Possible reliable alternative to BASH, with less bugs?
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Possible reliable alternative to BASH, with less bugs?
Hello, Bash is more of less a good shell. However, there are still some bugs, like the Tab auto completion. This issue is on Debian, Mint, Ubuntu, and many more debian-based. The last patch allows to fix it. Which possible reliable alternative to BASH, really stable, would you advice? ZSH would be my best alt. Best regards, Patrick
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrick295767
Hello, Bash is more of less a good shell. However, there are still some bugs, like the Tab auto completion. This issue is on Debian, Mint, Ubuntu, and many more debian-based. The last patch allows to fix it. Which possible reliable alternative to BASH, really stable, would you advice? ZSH would be my best alt. Best regards, Patrick
Tab-completion is working no problems (and always has) for me. And yet you claim there are "bugs", other than the link you have provided, what other "bugs" are you talking about??
Are you running on a LDAP client??
If you want to use something else, then why don't you?
Hello, Bash is more of less a good shell. However, there are still some bugs, like the Tab auto completion. This issue is on Debian, Mint, Ubuntu, and many more debian-based. The last patch allows to fix it. Which possible reliable alternative to BASH, really stable, would you advice? ZSH would be my best alt. Best regards, Patrick
tab-completion works on both my bashes.
no bug here.
Code:
bash --version
GNU bash, version 4.3.30(1)-release (i586-pc-linux-gnu)
...
bash --version
GNU bash, version 4.4.12(1)-release (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Yes, it works - obviously, definitely -, but tab-completion of zsh is much more fun/complete, because a lot of additional (artifical) intelligence has been built into that. I do not really like this kind of "intelligence" - in general, but actually in zsh it was very well designed and implemented.
Been using tab autocomplete all morning on my Debian 9 laptop (I actually had to use my personal laptop for work since I don't know how to do the things I needed to do in Windows).
Been using tab autocomplete all morning on my Debian 9 laptop (I actually had to use my personal laptop for work since I don't know how to do the things I needed to do in Windows).
I've probably been using tab autocomplete since sometime during the 80s on both Sparc workstations as well as an HP-UX.
Fact is the only time it didn't work as I expected, was not because of a bug, but because of a duplication in string and thus I needed to tap it again to see the list of options matching the autocompletion. And then it usually was because I had typed, 'c[tab]' and thus it had about 100 completions possible or something.
My assumption is that this problem was a one-of for release 12.04 of Ubuntu where I also assume that they fixed it.
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rtmistler
...
My assumption is that this problem was a one-of for release 12.04 of Ubuntu where I also assume that they fixed it.
The OP's link only mentions Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, not the other distro's he mentions. So I believe you are right. Unless the OP is trying to say because Ubuntu was affected that, by extension that must also mean Linux Mint and Debian as well (not that I agree with him, if he is trying to say that, mind you), well... it was only Ubuntu from my reading.
Distribution: Mainly Devuan, antiX, & Void, with Tiny Core, Fatdog, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,490
Rep:
There was nothing wrong with the original 'sh'.
People wanted shortcuts added to their shells, & so a variety sprang up to satisfy their desires. Each has certain features, & some have extras.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.