Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've been thinking of getting a bluray drive as a upgrade. Since this is my first time I will be using a bluray drive I have two questions though, I've seen on the Internet that VLC can play bluray discs, does all bluray discs play with VLC and second, do I need to install a codec to play the encrypted bluray discs?
I love how being legal is listed as not only a "feature" but also as something that makes it "safe". Safe from lawyers, maybe, but what about people who just want to freely use what they've purchased? This is a restriction, not a feature. It's a lack of a feature, and certainly not something that helps the user at all. I wish they'd stop patting themselves on the back about it like it's an accomplishment to not implement something. I just sat on my ass and didn't code, where's my recognition?
I understand they're too scared to get in trouble, but they should just say that, not talk about avoiding DRM-circumvention like it's in all of our best interests. How do they think anyone would feel using a library that proudly states it won't play the discs sitting up on your shelf that you paid good money for, not now or ever? DRM-circumvention hurts no one but gigantic corporations that can already handle the loss. In the interests of consumer freedom, Blu-Ray DRM must be broken.
And everyone wonders why I haven't made the switch to Blu-Ray. Those hardware manufacturers will get my money as soon as I am guaranteed my money's worth, and that means no more DRM to worry about (whether it's not used, or easily circumventable.) In my case, the prevalence of DRM in Blu-Ray is what stops me from adopting the technology, so they are losing out on making a profit from me already, without me even pirating or circumventing anything. Guess their plans are backfiring, huh?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.