LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


View Poll Results: Multiple choice: When would you install LibreOffice or OpenOffice?
LibreOffice Most of the Time 24 70.59%
OpenOffice Most of the Time 1 2.94%
LibreOffice if Windows 15 44.12%
OpenOffice if Windows 0 0%
LibreOffice if MacOS 8 23.53%
OpenOffice if MacOS 0 0%
LibreOffice if Linux 19 55.88%
OpenOffice if Linux 1 2.94%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-09-2017, 06:55 AM   #31
Mill J
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2017
Location: 127.0.0.1 Sweet 127.0.0.1
Distribution: Several Ubuntu based OS, LFS,Tahrpup, Quirky on Rpi and many others
Posts: 236

Rep: Reputation: 42

Note there are 2 different Wikipedia pages for OpenOffice, one is for the original discontinued OO and one is for Apache OO https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_OpenOffice

Quote:
BTW wps is free
Um not really have you read the license yet? I don't think Richard Stallman would consider it free.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-09-2017, 07:48 AM   #32
YesItsMe
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2014
Distribution: Void
Posts: 130

Rep: Reputation: 38
Richard Stallman is not the most reliable source about what is free and what is not.

business_kid: You are thinking too complicated. The reason for the fork was Oracle. That's about it.
 
Old 11-09-2017, 10:43 AM   #33
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware & Android
Posts: 8,716

Rep: Reputation: 887Reputation: 887Reputation: 887Reputation: 887Reputation: 887Reputation: 887Reputation: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by YesItsMe
Richard Stallman is not the most reliable source about what is free and what is not.
+1 on the -1 to Richard Stallman. He seems to have shown great vision or foresight in getting gnu.org to host the bones of what linux is built on; I wasted a day in a Linux Conference in Belfast some years ago. I fitted in poorly with the tight assed geeks and obstreperous sysadmins who came and heard him speak (as the main speaker). He proved himself very ill mannered on the day interrupting other speakers and in the end had nothing worthwhile to say.

@Mill J:I looked at the wikipedia pages. As you say, one is discontinued, the other has lowered the bar for itself. As I get crotchety, I resent people saying "Have you read <such-and-such>?" The implication is(usually correctly so) that I am speaking in ignorance of facts, but not this time. The Internet is too big for me to read, even just the English bits.

The WPS linux version is so bad I'll stick a windows one in a vm and reserve it for totally necessary use. It's an M$word clone; It doesn't do .odt
 
Old 11-09-2017, 07:42 PM   #34
Mill J
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2017
Location: 127.0.0.1 Sweet 127.0.0.1
Distribution: Several Ubuntu based OS, LFS,Tahrpup, Quirky on Rpi and many others
Posts: 236

Rep: Reputation: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by YesItsMe View Post
Richard Stallman is not the most reliable source about what is free and what is not.
I think you know what I meant, I didn't say he a reliable source, because I don't know. But anybody using Linux has used his software, or agreed to his licenses one time or another.

Last edited by Mill J; 11-09-2017 at 08:17 PM.
 
Old 11-09-2017, 07:46 PM   #35
YesItsMe
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2014
Distribution: Void
Posts: 130

Rep: Reputation: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mill J View Post
But anybody using Linux has used his software
This is technically not true. There are Linux distributions which come without the GNU userland, either by using Busybox or by using something entirely different, e.g. Android (which is basically the Linux kernel with a NetBSD userland under a Java-like VM).
 
Old 11-10-2017, 04:25 AM   #36
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware & Android
Posts: 8,716

Rep: Reputation: 887Reputation: 887Reputation: 887Reputation: 887Reputation: 887Reputation: 887Reputation: 887
Quote:
This is technically not true. There are Linux distributions which come without the GNU userland,
I'll not argue. It's the everyday stuff I was talking about: bash, autoconf, diffutils, binutils, emacs,findutils, gcc, etc. Let's just settle on the main ones: If there's a distro out there built without any gnu code on a machine not using any gnu code, it's only because they have gone to excessive lengths to avoid gnu code.

.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-06-2017, 12:41 AM   #37
drbcpg
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1
I have used LibreOffice on Linux and Windows 7 for many years. What is the greatest feature is that the user interface has never changed? They have made substantial improvements and new features over the years. When I need a file to go to a Windows user I save it in that format. I have never had a problem saving or opening an MS Office file.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-13-2017, 02:36 PM   #38
MensaWater
LQ Guru
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Distribution: Redhat (RHEL), CentOS, Fedora, CoreOS, Debian, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Solaris, SCO
Posts: 7,075
Blog Entries: 14

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251
LibreOffice on Mac - maybe not?

I'm disappointed in this thread. Upon installing LibreOffice on a neighbor's MacBook it took forever to finish "verifying" and on checking I found that this is common for Macs not only during the install but also frequently after reboots. I'm even more disappointed at the help for the issue that assumes everyone knows how to get to terminal which I'm guessing a lot of Mac users don't even know exists.
 
Old 12-13-2017, 06:04 PM   #39
RockDoctor
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Minnesota, US
Distribution: Fedora, Linux Mint, Ubuntu
Posts: 1,606

Rep: Reputation: 352Reputation: 352Reputation: 352Reputation: 352
LO on both Linux and Windows for me.
 
Old 12-14-2017, 04:46 PM   #40
_roman_
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2017
Location: _Austro_Bavaria_
Distribution: SLACKWARE 96, SUSE 6.2, REDHAT, Gentoo, ARCH-Linux, PC-LINUXOS, Linux-Mint, OpenSuse, REDFLAG, TURBO
Posts: 79

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
openoffice is dead.

Anything oracle based is evil. They have some package for java in gentoo linux which I have hard masked. I hate packages with fetch restriction. It means I as the user have to fetch from a shitty oracle homepage the file myself. And I see ads, the file is somewhere moved or hidden. Kinda annoying. Oracle is just evil company like IBM and others

Libreoffice is just one option.

I learnt recently about googles way of spreadsheets.

For my daily spent spreadsheet I use since this year google spreadsheet. Libreoffice is not up to the task anymore. When you want to get it done, use google spreadsheet. BAsic word processing use libreoffice.

Libreoffice crashed a month ago with a excel generated spreadsheet for a sports event. I had to fill it out and return it. It crashed everytime wiht the same input pattern.

For MS office based file I should install windows 10 again with ms office, as libreoffice is not up to the task in my point of view. When i need an hour because it crashes everytime i fill out one single cell in an excel sheet it is not useable at all.

Also backup wise is libreoffice junk and dead meat. I have 4 webbrowsers anyway installed. Libreoffice needs a lot of disc space, needs around 110 minutes to build everytime. I have to build that junk at least 3 times in gentoo linux a month average in past year 2017. It is also too big in my point of view. The software should use not more than 200MiB on the disc itself. The source is quite large
 
Old Yesterday, 09:55 AM   #41
fatmac
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Upper Hale, Surrey/Hants Border, UK
Distribution: AntiX
Posts: 1,989

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I don't use either, but if I were asked to install office software for someone else, I'd install Libre Office.
 
Old Yesterday, 11:06 AM   #42
cynwulf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Walsall, England
Posts: 1,978
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 1035Reputation: 1035Reputation: 1035Reputation: 1035Reputation: 1035Reputation: 1035Reputation: 1035Reputation: 1035
Quote:
Originally Posted by YesItsMe View Post
Android (which is basically the Linux kernel with a NetBSD userland under a Java-like VM).
This is not exactly correct.

Android has it's own libc called "Bionic", not NetBSD libc, the 1st stated goal of Bionic:

Quote:
Why Bionic?
Why build a custom libc library?
License: we want to keep GPL out of user-space
And it's released under 3-clause BSD.

There are apparently some NetBSD tools included, but I don't think Bionic was based on NetBSD libc.

As a *BSD user and someone who is not really a fan of GPL and copy left licences, I don't really have any objections to that, but I doubt their motivations are pure by any means. The android platform is pretty much proprietary in all but licence after all. The 'GPL avoidance' (or isolation) is to guarantee protection of proprietary IP (the numerous vendor blob drivers).

But you do raise the valid point that it's not really "Linux" in the sense that's not "GUN/Linux" often simply called "Linux". It's also not a "distribution" in the sense that google develop it and provide it "as is" as a firmware. It's just an OS which happens to use a modified Linux kernel and some more permissive (e.g. BSD, MIT, ISC, etc) and proprietary licenced code.
 
  


Reply

Tags
libreoffice, openoffice


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: LibreOffice vs. OpenOffice: Why LibreOffice Wins LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-29-2014 11:50 AM
[SOLVED] compatibility of LibreOffice with OpenOffice wiliamvw Linux - Software 9 12-29-2011 11:23 AM
LibreOffice vs OpenOffice.org varunb Linux - Newbie 7 11-10-2011 01:08 PM
openoffice / libreoffice value constraints tinyTux Linux - Desktop 3 07-26-2011 12:31 PM
LXer: LibreOffice VS Openoffice LXer Syndicated Linux News 1 02-10-2011 06:48 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration