LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2006, 05:14 PM   #1
lukeprog
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 92

Rep: Reputation: 15
Net Nanny for Linux?


There are surprisingly few and sparse posts on LinuxQuestions about a Net Nanny alternative (a web content filter) for Linux. So far, I'm aware of two decent options: DansGuardian + Squid and CensorNet. DansGuardian + Squid is apparently a bitch to configure and requires a dedicated proxy server, so I'm not too keen on that. CensorNet apparently installs from a bootCD and takes everything over instead of installing as a package on whatever Linux machine I've already built, so that's weird and unwanted.

Any other suggestions for a web content filter for Linux? I seem to remember finding another one that looked good a while ago but not I can't find it for the life of me.
 
Old 03-10-2006, 05:47 PM   #2
cs-cam
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,545

Rep: Reputation: 57
Not many younger kids as linux users limits the choices a little I guess. Don't some ISPs do that kind of filtering at their end these days? Might be worth looking at if you can't find an alternative.
 
Old 03-10-2006, 07:23 PM   #3
lukeprog
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 92

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I can't imagine any ISPs do this kind of filtering. I'm talking about very harsh language and porn (text and images).
 
Old 03-10-2006, 10:56 PM   #4
foo_bar_foo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,553

Rep: Reputation: 53
if you feel like farting around with the configuration privoxy
http://www.privoxy.org/
might help you out
you certainly will learn about regular expresions anyway
 
Old 03-11-2006, 12:33 AM   #5
craigevil
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Distribution: Debian Sid/RPIOS
Posts: 4,903
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537
You could also try :
Welcome to My Linux ISP
http://www.mylinuxisp.com/index.php?extra=17

Or for Firefox:
ProCon is a content filter for the Firefox browser, based on BlockXXX (by Tom Christensen). ProCon filters any type of web pages, but if left on default it limits itself to filter pages containing explicit content automatically, based on the text. ProCon can also censure any single word, and create a WhiteList."
http://procon.mozdev.org/

HOWTO Parental Control, Content Filtering, Surfing Anon - MozillaZine Forums
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=338572
 
Old 03-11-2006, 04:46 AM   #6
cs-cam
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,545

Rep: Reputation: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by lukeprog
I can't imagine any ISPs do this kind of filtering. I'm talking about very harsh language and porn (text and images).
Never actually used it but there are a couple around here who advertise a service like that.
 
Old 03-15-2006, 06:52 PM   #7
mazinoz
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Mansfield Queensland Australia
Distribution: Linux Mint - Tara
Posts: 497

Rep: Reputation: 35
Squid_Guard
 
Old 03-15-2006, 10:45 PM   #8
JimDog
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado, USA
Distribution: Fedora Core
Posts: 100

Rep: Reputation: 15
I'm a little confused about your comment on Dansguardian + Squid...you say it requires a proxy....Squid is the proxy server.

And it's SUPER easy to setup. I just did a fresh install of FC3 (don't ask) this past weekend. Had to re-setup all of my stuff, including Dansguardian + Squid. My daughter has her own computer in her room with a wifi card and it's setup to use my linux box as the proxy server / filter.

Out of the box it works great, but I like to tighten it down even more. A simple "**" inside the "bannedsitelist" config file and then I add only those sites I approve of in the "exceptionsitelist". In other words a white list approach.

If she wants to go to some website a friend at school told her about, I get to check it out first...if I approve I add it to the white list. Works great.

My daughter is only 7, if your kids are older then the out of the box filtering is probably just fine.
 
Old 03-15-2006, 11:08 PM   #9
jiml8
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,171

Rep: Reputation: 116Reputation: 116
Quote:
Out of the box it works great, but I like to tighten it down even more. A simple "**" inside the "bannedsitelist" config file and then I add only those sites I approve of in the "exceptionsitelist". In other words a white list approach.

If she wants to go to some website a friend at school told her about, I get to check it out first...if I approve I add it to the white list. Works great.
Makes you work pretty hard, and interferes substantially with your daughter's ability to browse, thus providing her a positive incentive to find ways around your restrictions.

In our house, we don't use any content filtering software at all. We also forbid computers in bedrooms; all computers are located in public spaces within the house. The kids have the freedom to browse, with the knowledge that at any time mom or dad may appear and look over their shoulders.

Also, in our house, my knowledge of computers is vastly greater than that of my kids, and they understand that whenever I deem it necessary I will monitor any of their computer activity - without their knowledge or consent - that I wish to monitor.

Further, I do educate them on "safe computing" and about the dangers of cyber stalkers. And after that, we let them browse where they will. Occasionally, I peek in. I have never found a problem
 
Old 03-16-2006, 12:41 PM   #10
lukeprog
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 92

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Okay, Squid is the web proxy on the local machine, but I still need Apache set up. Does Squidgaurd require that?

ProCon is infinitely easier to set up (no proxy server, no Apache, GUI config, etc.) and therefore more what I'm looking for. But it doesn't yet password-protect modification, and it ignores Firefox tabs loaded in the background.

Last edited by lukeprog; 03-16-2006 at 12:46 PM.
 
Old 03-16-2006, 11:15 PM   #11
mazinoz
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Mansfield Queensland Australia
Distribution: Linux Mint - Tara
Posts: 497

Rep: Reputation: 35
Apache needs to be installed and there is only minor configuration required. A squid proxy server is in
itself a security tool designed to limit access to certain services and ports.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.Net on Linux neosap Linux - Software 3 05-10-2005 08:33 AM
.NET and linux? Lleb_KCir Linux - Software 2 01-25-2005 10:17 PM
Xp to net via linux pingurslap Linux - Networking 3 01-08-2004 12:31 PM
Help with getting Linux on the Net timmay_lars Linux - Networking 2 11-11-2003 01:56 PM
freshrpms.net & rpmfind.net are down! JoeyJoeJo General 4 08-28-2003 05:05 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration