LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-13-2007, 07:55 AM   #1
MyHeartPumpsFreon
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: The States, Florida
Distribution: Lonely Werewolf
Posts: 251

Rep: Reputation: 30
MP BIOS bug: 8254


Hey,

I just got an error that states "MP BIOS bug: 8254. Timer not connected to IO-APIC. I've researched this and it has to do with sending IRQ to multiple CPU's. Now I have an AMD 64 X2 4200, and Fedora 8 64-bit has been installed since Sunday. I only received this error when I installed a new PSU and video card last night at about 11:00EST. I've seen various fixes for this problem, but I have a question... will any of them make my processor lose functionality? I don't want to lose any performance if possible. Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,

Brandon
 
Old 11-14-2007, 11:56 AM   #2
tredegar
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora40
Posts: 6,156

Rep: Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435
Quote:
I've seen various fixes for this problem, but I have a question... will any of them make my processor lose functionality? I don't want to lose any performance if possible. Any help is appreciated.
Well, you have not told us what these "fixes" are, so we cannot comment on what they might or might not do.
However, it's unlikely you'll loose any performance.
I suggest you benchmark your PC, apply one of the fixes, and re-test it. All OK = Good. Something not right = Undo the "fix" you tried an try a different "fix".
Have fun
 
Old 11-14-2007, 12:22 PM   #3
MyHeartPumpsFreon
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: The States, Florida
Distribution: Lonely Werewolf
Posts: 251

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Hey,

Sorry for being so vague. I posted this after I first woke up in the morning. NOt much of a morning person. The fixes I was referring to were posted in the Ubuntuforums.org: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=191355&page=1

The fixes consisted of passing 'noapic' to the kernel, or disabling it from the BIOS. I was thinking that if this was disabled, it would decrease performance. Can you suggest a decent benchmarking tool? I'm not familiar with any.

Thanks,

Brandon
 
Old 11-14-2007, 12:53 PM   #4
tredegar
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora40
Posts: 6,156

Rep: Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435
Quote:
Can you suggest a decent benchmarking tool? I'm not familiar with any.
Sorry, no. If my PC is working, I'm happy.
But passing noapic to the kernel is not going to affect your performance, only the way interrupts are allocated and handled by the kernel (which is concerned with performance, and will do things the very best way it can). So just try it
 
Old 11-14-2007, 01:44 PM   #5
MyHeartPumpsFreon
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: The States, Florida
Distribution: Lonely Werewolf
Posts: 251

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Hey,

Thanks. T minus 3 hours and count before I go home and try it.

Regards,

Brandon
 
Old 11-17-2007, 09:37 AM   #6
MyHeartPumpsFreon
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: The States, Florida
Distribution: Lonely Werewolf
Posts: 251

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Hey,

sorry it took me so long to get back. I've tried many switches from the grub menu and none of them work. The ones I've tried are: noapic--, nolapic, nolapic_timer. I've also tried looking in my BIOS to try and disable apic, but there is no such option. Anyone else have any ideas? It doesn't seem to be system critical, but it's kind of annoying seeing that pop up every time I boot.

Regards,

Brandon
 
Old 11-17-2007, 10:44 AM   #7
MasterC
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613

Rep: Reputation: 69
APIC is your Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller. You may want to hunt around your BIOS for IRQ options. The one time I had similar messages from some hardware there was indeed an APIC option in the BIOS, you may just have to look for different names.

-Chad
 
Old 11-17-2007, 11:39 AM   #8
tredegar
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora40
Posts: 6,156

Rep: Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435
Kernel interrupt options I am aware of:

Code:
Interrupts are a complex aspect of kernel behavior. The boot time options deal
mostly with the interface between the kernel and the hardware that handles inter-
rupts, such as the Intel chip’s Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller
(APIC).
apic              Change the verbosity of the APIC subsystem when booting.
                  apic=[quiet|verbose|debug]
                  Control how much information the APIC subsystem generates
                  when booting the kernel. The default is quiet.
noapic            Do not use any IOAPICs.
                  Prevent the kernel from using any of the IOAPICs that might be
                  present in the system.
lapic             Enable the local APIC.
                  Cause the kernel to enable the local APIC even if the BIOS had
                  disabled it.
nolapic           Do not use the local APIC.
                  Tell the kernel not to use the local APIC.
noirqbalance      Disable kernel IRQ balancing.
                  Disable all of the built-in kernel IRQ balancing logic.
irqfixup          Basic fix to interrupt problems.
                  When an interrupt is not handled, search all known interrupt
                  handlers for it. This is intended to get systems with badly broken
                  firmware running.
irqpoll           Extended fix to interrupt problems.
                  When an interrupt is not handled, search all known interrupt
                  handlers for it and also check all handlers on each
                  timer-interrupt.
                  This is intended to get systems with badly broken firmware
                  running.
noirqdebug        Disable unhandled interrupt detection.
                  By default, the kernel attempts to detect and disable unhandled
                  interrupt sources because they can cause problems with the respon-
                  siveness of the rest of the kernel if left unchecked. This option
                  disables this logic.
BIOS options differ, but if there is an option for "Enable PnP", disable it.
 
Old 11-17-2007, 01:16 PM   #9
MyHeartPumpsFreon
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: The States, Florida
Distribution: Lonely Werewolf
Posts: 251

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Hey,

Thanks Tred. I'll try those when I get home. Chad... I looked everywhere in my BIOS. The only thing in there related to IRQ is for my parallel port and what IRQ number I'd like it to be or if I'd like to disable it. I've disabled it and it still comes up. there is NO other disable option for IRQ.

Regards,

Brandon
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MP-BIOS BUG 8254 timer not connected - use noapic option to boot yozoff Linux - Hardware 16 01-16-2022 04:29 AM
MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC Hook99 Linux - Newbie 3 12-28-2021 02:45 AM
mp bios bug 8254 timer not connected to io-apic Alex DePena Linux - Hardware 10 12-28-2007 01:53 PM
BIOS Bug grabro Linux - Hardware 2 10-19-2007 09:05 AM
MP-BIOS bug: 8254; Plus, only one processor showing zok Linux - Software 3 01-24-2007 08:24 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration