View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.


  Search this Thread
Old 05-09-2008, 05:23 PM   #16
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: boston, ma
Distribution: fedora, ubuntu, slack, arch
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 15

thanks for the reply guys,

as armonox said, HFS+ support has been around for a bit but writing and journaling don't go together.

time machine says journaling needs to be enabled to work, but fedora says journaling needs to be disabled to work. but i have heard a few people mention using a samba share as a time machine backup; this is in direct contradiction to that first sentence. i was wondering if anyone had successfully done this, if so how?

Last edited by brisbin33; 05-09-2008 at 06:25 PM.
Old 05-14-2008, 10:34 AM   #17
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Vector Linux 5.1 Std., Vector Linux 5.8 Std., Win2k, XP, OS X (10.4 & 10.5)
Posts: 344

Rep: Reputation: 42
Just to follow up it appears that OS X 10.5 has some "issues". One the most vexing are inconsistent problems with connecting to,reading and writing to Samba shares. It seems that unpatched Leopard will work for some users but patched Leopard introduces a more consistent pattern of "breaks" in file sharing to and from Samba servers.

Here are the links for more details:

I have personally experienced problems with a Patched Leopard hanging or corrupting files moved from a Samba share to the desktop.

This is definitely an Apple OS issue so don't blame/bug the Samba developers about this.

Last edited by thorn168; 05-14-2008 at 10:57 AM. Reason: Added link
Old 07-19-2009, 08:04 PM   #18
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2009
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
thanks for the tip

i was trying to do just the thing. Had a mac at work which we kept all our music on for streaming during the arduous hours of the workday and after the motherboard fried I wanted to swap it to another system...mounting -t hfsplus worked like a charm and saved me hours of head vs. wall time.

Old 01-12-2010, 05:56 PM   #19
Registered: Feb 2008
Posts: 413
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 35
It has been a year since the last post. Can I mount a partition with hfs+ and WRITE to it ? I am trying to make Mac and Linux to be able to read
and write a common portable drive (at home, I use linux while at work Mac, and I carry my drive around). I googled and found that it is rather disappointing that Mac does not
recognized ext3 (well, there is a buggy driver I don't even what to try).
Thanks for sharing !
Old 01-12-2010, 06:03 PM   #20
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: pittsburgh!
Distribution: fc10
Posts: 28

Rep: Reputation: 15
Centguy -

It has been a while since I dealt with my issue (I'm sure that things have changed significantly in the past two years), but when I was dealing with the problem I am pretty sure that I could only read the hfs+, no writing, when I was using Linux (I believe it was either FC8 or 10).

Why don't you do FAT, I've never had a problem reading or writing to them no matter what OS I was running? Everybody loves FAT partitions!
(nb - I make no claims of understanding the nuisances of the computer science world ... just what I need to do to get the job done. I'm sure somebody will tear me apart for suggesting FAT ; )

- Travis
Old 01-13-2010, 09:03 AM   #21
Registered: Feb 2008
Posts: 413
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 35
Sure, there is no shame about using VFAT. At the end, computer is just a tool. Getting things done is the most important issues.
Old 01-13-2010, 07:06 PM   #22
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: pittsburgh!
Distribution: fc10
Posts: 28

Rep: Reputation: 15
"there is no shame about using VFAT"

haha - very nice, very true! However, sometimes I AM ashamed to admit that I use Windows : )
Old 03-04-2010, 11:42 AM   #23
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Distribution: Fedora 12, Ubuntu 10.10, Linux Mint 10
Posts: 47

Rep: Reputation: 2
another option

another option to this vexing problem is to use a windows emulator to install macdrive... this way you would gain WRX capabilities under any linux kernel... the only problem i am encountering is i cant disable the initial mac capabilities... (previously referenced) if i could disable the initial HFS+ support then i would have complete WRX access to my mac drives, or at least this is my theory... any ideas?
Old 05-12-2011, 02:11 PM   #24
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Distribution: Open SuSE 11.4
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0

Originally Posted by rcase5 View Post
Then, I found a reference to an 'hfsplus' file system on a web site discussing the source code for the FC6 kernel. So I tried:

mount -t hfsplus <blah blah>

It worked! ...

Great job, thanks!



apple, fc6, hfs, hfs+, hfsplus, linux, macos, mount

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Volumes - mounting danimalz Linux - General 8 12-29-2006 06:17 AM
Error mounting HFS+ volume: unable to find HFS+ superblock applewax Linux - General 3 05-31-2006 08:45 AM
Mounting Solaris UFS volumes under Linux? ldieter Linux - General 1 02-20-2005 08:19 AM
linux mounting network windows volumes adriaanbw Linux - Networking 2 09-12-2003 05:29 AM
Mounting Volumes TrueSword Linux - General 1 10-06-2002 04:54 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration