LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-04-2004, 04:21 PM   #1
jon_k
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Distribution: Mepis Linux 2004
Posts: 547

Rep: Reputation: 30
motherboard sensors broken?


Here is the output of the 'sensors' command:

Code:
w83627hf-isa-0290
Adapter: ISA adapter
VCore 1:   +1.64 V  (min =  +1.76 V, max =  +1.94 V)
VCore 2:   +2.45 V  (min =  +1.76 V, max =  +1.94 V)
+3.3V:     +3.33 V  (min =  +3.14 V, max =  +3.48 V)
+5V:       +4.98 V  (min =  +4.77 V, max =  +5.25 V)
+12V:     +11.81 V  (min = +10.84 V, max = +13.21 V)
-12V:     -13.08 V  (min = -13.16 V, max = -10.77 V)
-5V:       -5.18 V  (min =  -5.23 V, max =  -4.73 V)
V5SB:      +5.47 V  (min =  +4.77 V, max =  +5.25 V)
VBat:      +3.37 V  (min =  +2.40 V, max =  +3.60 V)
fan1:        0 RPM  (min = 2657 RPM, div = 2)
fan2:     3229 RPM  (min = 2657 RPM, div = 2)
fan3:        0 RPM  (min = 1328 RPM, div = 4)
temp1:       +39°C  (high =   -21°C, hyst =   -14°C)   sensor = thermistor

temp2:     +45.0°C  (high =   +75°C, hyst =   +70°C)   sensor = diode
temp3:     -48.0°C  (high =   +75°C, hyst =   +70°C)   sensor = thermistor

vid:      +1.850 V  (VRM Version 8.2)
alarms:
beep_enable:
          Sound alarm disabled

eeprom-i2c-0-53
Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 5000
Memory type:            DRDRAM RIMM
Memory size (MB):       128

eeprom-i2c-0-52
Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 5000
Memory type:            DRDRAM RIMM
Memory size (MB):       128

eeprom-i2c-0-51
Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 5000
Memory type:            DRDRAM RIMM
Memory size (MB):       128

eeprom-i2c-0-50
Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 5000
Memory type:            DRDRAM RIMM
Memory size (MB):       128
Relevant lines include
temp1: +39°C (high = -21°C, hyst = -14°C) sensor = thermistor

temp2: +45.0°C (high = +75°C, hyst = +70°C) sensor = diode
temp3: -48.0°C (high = +75°C, hyst = +70°C) sensor = thermistor

Temp2 = CPU temp
Temp1 = Ambient Case Temp

How was the highest temp for the case temp -21 C when it is currently +39 C (breaking the high record of -21 C)? I'm in Texas anyways, and it's not possible it was ever that cold.

Whats the 'hyst' mean?

Why is temp3 -48 degree's (it always seems to be around that temp) again I'm in Texas and it's not possible for that temp unless I had some liquid nitrogen on it.

Any ideas?
 
Old 11-04-2004, 04:48 PM   #2
Electro
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,042

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Re-edit your lmsensors script to whatever formula or value it should be. Temperature sensors especially thermistor are not accurate at all. Thermistor have an log graph, so you will need a very long formula to make it close to linear. Linear means a straight line rising or failling for every point on the graph. Diodes and transistors make execellent temperature sensors because they have a predictable tempature charactistic that relates well with resistance.
 
Old 11-04-2004, 04:48 PM   #3
Baddox
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Mexico, Missouri
Distribution: Changes frequently
Posts: 49

Rep: Reputation: 15
I may be wrong, but I've noticed with the utilities that come with motherboards, 3rd party utils, and in BIOS's, temperature sensors never seen to be reliable. For me the temperatures are either stuck at on stop and never change, or seen to be completely unresonably high or low, like in your case. In your case it looks like there's some sort of bug that just isn't recording new high-low records. But if you want really reliable measurements I'd recommend purchasing temperature probes that interface to 5.25" drive bay led displays. Sorry that I can't really help you with your problem though.

EDIT: sorry for the redundancy with the prev post, coincidentally we submitted at nearly the exact same time.

Last edited by Baddox; 11-04-2004 at 04:49 PM.
 
Old 11-04-2004, 07:06 PM   #4
ror
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 583

Rep: Reputation: 33
just installed lm_sensors today

temp 3 (the crazy -21 one) will just be a sensor that's not actually used.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
motherboard temp sensors, shoudl i trust them? santaliqueur Linux - Hardware 10 09-10-2005 08:27 AM
Broken Acpi thermal sensors Half_Elf Linux - Hardware 2 03-25-2005 10:18 PM
Help!! No motherboard sensors detected. maxx_arg Slackware 3 07-06-2004 12:07 AM
lm sensors Pauli Fedora 0 03-23-2004 05:33 PM
lm sensors, no sensors found N_A_J_M Linux - General 3 01-22-2003 05:09 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration