Most lightweight browser that uses Javascript (Youtube situation solved, still need help.)
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Most lightweight browser that uses Javascript (Youtube situation solved, still need help.)
I am looking for minimal browser that doesn't use much storage and power. I know that playing a Youtube video does take a bit of bandwith and power to play. What is the most lightweight browser that can play Youtube videos?
Edit: I have a solution for Youtube involving connecting a Smartphone to a smart tv navigating the tv's Youtube app with that smartphone. Now I am just in search of for a lightweight browser that can run javascript, saves cookies, loads images, does not load videos, (or has an option to disable video loading.)
If it does load videos, I might try it if it runs very well and if it doesn't crash. If it helps to narrow it down, i'l be using the browser for Facebook, gmail, web searches on the DuckDuckGo search engine. (that's rare tho because I use the Links2 terminal browser for straight up research because it loads very fast due to the very low bandwith usage and it displays images in the command line.)
I do not want to use a Youtube download tool ever because it violates terms of service on Youtube. Also bandwith isn't really my concern. My concern is the storage taken by the browser and ram taken by the browser. I want a web browser that can play Youtube videos but the browser itself doesn't take a lot of resources to do that like Chrome or Firefox. I actually have been using Midori/Netsurf for a while on the same machine and was wondering if there was a smaller browser than that that could play Youtube videos a very minimal browser so that I could just use one light weight/minimal browser that can do everything online.
If it doesn't play the ads then I can't use it. Is there a browser that uses less power than Midori? Just wondering what the lowest requiring browser is that can play Youtube videos not looking for other options tho they are nice to note.
just tried dillo with youtube, after changing the useragent, it (youtube) didn't complain anymore, but i'm seeing only gobbledigook.
you will need a modern browser engine; which frontend you use is not all that relevant, but qupzilla (now falkon) is lighter, and so is surf, which is out-of-date.
there's also qutebrowser and a few more webkit frontends.
search around.
Last edited by ondoho; 04-15-2018 at 01:01 AM.
Reason: clarification
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.