Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
04-25-2009, 01:38 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
Mdadm: reporting 2 drive failures in RAID5 array
Hello,
I am having trouble with my raid5 array. It is not a boot drive and is used only for file storage. It is comprised of 9x1tb drives giving me arounf 7.2tb usable space. mdadm is reporting that two of the drives have failed (i highly doubt that, they are only 6 months old). The array has around 50gb free and I do not have a backup of any of the data.
Array (md0) is comprised of sd[a-j]1 except sdb1 (boot drive).
I am running ubuntu server jaunty (upgraded the other day).
the result of 'mdadm -v -A /dev/md0' is http://pastebin.com/m2657adcd
the result of 'mdadm --examine /dev/sdd1' and 'mdadm --examine /dev/sdg1' is http://pastebin.com/mccbb16a
thanks
wolfywolf
|
|
|
04-25-2009, 05:39 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: Solaris 9 & 10, Mac OS X, Ubuntu Server
Posts: 1,197
Rep:
|
Why do you doubt it? Failures of cheap 1TB drives are not uncommon. And, if the drives were all bought together and come from the same batch, then correlated failures might be expected. People I know are using raid 6 if the data matters, and doing backups if it really matters.
Maybe some guru will post some magic for you, but you may have simply lost your data.
|
|
|
04-26-2009, 10:32 AM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 2
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Is it possible to re-sync the array, re-calculating the "bad bit" therefore keeping the rest intact?
Edit: The disks were not all bought at the same time. Array has been grown gradually from 4 drives to 9 drives. Am considering Raid6 if I can get my data back...
Last edited by wolfywolf; 04-26-2009 at 10:34 AM.
|
|
|
04-26-2009, 11:54 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: Solaris 9 & 10, Mac OS X, Ubuntu Server
Posts: 1,197
Rep:
|
I have no personal experience trying to recover from a linux raid failure.
However, a quick google of "linux recovery for failed raid" turns up as the very first link, http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8874, which looks like it might be useful, or at least informative.
Some of the other links might be useful as well, though some are commercial applications or services.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:50 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|