Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
View Poll Results: What would you rate Mandrake 9.0
|
10: really good
|
  
|
16 |
44.44% |
9: almost there
|
  
|
7 |
19.44% |
8: looking good, needs a little work
|
  
|
4 |
11.11% |
7: Still have some flaws
|
  
|
6 |
16.67% |
6: stick with Mandy 8.2
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Forget trying it, it doesn't work!
|
  
|
3 |
8.33% |
 |
|
10-07-2002, 05:53 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: May 2002
Distribution: SUSE 9.2 Pro
Posts: 98
Rep:
|
Mandrake 9.0 Poll
What would you rate Mandrake 9.0?
|
|
|
10-07-2002, 06:44 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Plymouth, England.
Distribution: Mostly Debian based systems
Posts: 4,368
Rep:
|
Erm, why is the lowest numerical answer possible a 6? That's some strange way of counting! As for my answer... not tried it yet. Downloaded it just now, attempting to burn it to CD (damn cheap CDs... over 1/2 have been unburnable) but running into probs. My guess, being a .0 release is that it'll be either a 7 or 8. I would go for 9, but Mandy 8.2 was a 9. And whilst I'm completely confusing myself with numbers here, 11 was a race horse, 12 was 12, 11 1 1 race, 12 1 1 2.
|
|
|
10-07-2002, 09:43 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: May 2002
Distribution: SUSE 9.2 Pro
Posts: 98
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I just wanted to get some feed back from people, I have 8.2 and works pretty good, but i've been hearing mix stuff about 9.0, just want to see what most people think about it.
|
|
|
10-08-2002, 11:30 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Canada
Distribution: Redhat 9.0
Posts: 637
Rep:
|
I like it better than 8.2 because it has Gnome 2.0, a more enhanced instalation, and updated web browsers. I have not had any problems with it's stability and I've been using it for a couple weeks (it only came out a couple weeks ago).
|
|
|
10-08-2002, 03:28 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: May 2002
Distribution: SUSE 9.2 Pro
Posts: 98
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Coome on people, i know more than 6 people have tried it. 
|
|
|
10-09-2002, 01:46 AM
|
#6
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613
Rep:
|
Sure, I did.
I liked it alot! Very nice newbie distro, excellent interface, and easily enough to figure most things out.
No problems at all so far...
Still using Slack most of the time, but Mandy is very nice.
10 on your scale
Cool
|
|
|
10-09-2002, 09:08 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: May 2002
Distribution: SUSE 9.2 Pro
Posts: 98
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hmm, is it a hard process to upgrade from 8.2 to 9.0 by using the RPMS? Maybe I just might burn 9.0 on to a CD. hmm 
|
|
|
10-09-2002, 09:27 PM
|
#8
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613
Rep:
|
With GCC3.2 being a big change, I'd suggest going the, backup, and reinstall 9.0 way, rather than RPM it to death.
Cool
|
|
|
10-09-2002, 10:05 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: May 2002
Distribution: SUSE 9.2 Pro
Posts: 98
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Yep, i think that would be the best way to go, a clean installation of Mandy 9.0
I don't really have anything worth saving on 8.2, i just play around with it and learn things.
|
|
|
10-14-2002, 04:32 PM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: SW Coast of Florida, USA-- in fact, ground zero for Charley is where my town is
Distribution: Mandrake 10 Community, SuSE 9+
Posts: 167
Rep:
|
I like it, but do not compile a lot of things that were coded for gcc 2.96 or down on gcc 3.2. The included things work, the Club stuff for 9.0 works, Netscape 7.0 no longer spawns multiple VMs sand Mozilla-bins with one per Windows even with Kaffee running, I would say it is better than 8.2 graphically and KDE behaves better and runs faster. Oh, StarOffice 6.0 and OpenOffice both work right now too....
EVERYTHING my video driver can handle runs right. USB Scanners run right. 9.0 is LSB certified, and the download edition has the LSB RPM with it. hdparm, the enhanced one, is on the distro download ISO set also.
The installer\software manager is now a front end for gRMPi for the most part. This was a kinda heavy thing to do, but when your Software Manager author goes elsewhere and leaves code with holes, what is a distro pub to do??? They Modularized it, and the thing even checks RPM sigs now (MD5SUM check at install time, anyone?) and rejects unsigged RPMs by default. The Software Manager also times out and hops to alternate mirror sources faster if you have defined multiple update sources (I have 4 right now, update-source through update-source3). This is nice!
Top Grade.
John.
|
|
|
10-16-2002, 10:32 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 41
Rep:
|
mandrake 9.0
Downloaded the iso's and installed it right after it became available. I had 8.2 but decided to try 9.0 I am a newbie and have got netscape running for my browser xmms running for my mp3s I have only used the open office software a few times and it seems to be working well although it still loads up rather slow. I am using the kde desktop and I haven't been at my windoze machine in over a week, basically I am just trying to learn what I can about the operating system and so far I really haven't had to many problems. Just thought I would throw in my 2 cents worth
|
|
|
10-17-2002, 05:17 AM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: SW Coast of Florida, USA-- in fact, ground zero for Charley is where my town is
Distribution: Mandrake 10 Community, SuSE 9+
Posts: 167
Rep:
|
That is cool. Feel free to say what you like best as far as software. Why would help too.
I use KDe mostly, myself.
John.
|
|
|
10-17-2002, 11:57 AM
|
#13
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 3
Rep:
|
Mdk 9 is definitely the best release by far and IMO, the best distro (of those I've tried--and yes that includes RH 8).
It impressed me so much that I finally dumped Windows and made the permanent switch to Linux--and not regretting the decision one bit. I have to admit, I still do have a WineX dependency though--some (non-native) games are just a bit too good for me to drop cold turkey.
Last edited by HaloScan; 10-17-2002 at 11:58 AM.
|
|
|
10-17-2002, 04:02 PM
|
#14
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: SW Coast of Florida, USA-- in fact, ground zero for Charley is where my town is
Distribution: Mandrake 10 Community, SuSE 9+
Posts: 167
Rep:
|
RedHat is more for a businessman who needs to hook to a server setup. It is reasonable for the uses a business person needs to put it to.
Mandrake is more for the "common man" who likes to game and has some work to do also. It has better USB support, and a lot of gamers like things like USB mice, USB keyboards, etc. With the final of version 9.0, it is also easier to install-- and if you are not used to the older ways of sysadmin it is easier to maintain in re Hardware setup. They also seem to have gotten co-ordination with KDE more down pat-- the KDE 3.04 RPMs dropped right in-- although I DID use urpmi as su to do this. All I did, and I am not sure this was even needful, was restart X afterwards to get the newer KDE up and running. The 3.01 to 3.02 and then to 3.03 KDE transitions were rougher in 8.2 (I am multibooting a few linuxes and a windows and other things that are hyper techie (a couple BSDs). I am a linux semi-noob at this point because I keep investigatingt he plumbing of every new O/S and everything I learn about any of the POSIX O/S families helps with all teh members (no, the details are not picture perfect identical, but the patterns of use are scarily similar). Of them all, I find myself using Mandrake 9.0 most now.
John.
|
|
|
10-17-2002, 04:45 PM
|
#15
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: dev/null
Distribution: redhat, mandrake
Posts: 218
Rep:
|
I have it installed on my laptop at the moment, and I'm happy with it,
first I wanted to install RH 8 first, but I decided to play with mandy for a while.. hell I stuck with it.. it's perfect for a desktop OS. I didnt try stability but I can work with it.. I rated it a big 10.
I AM curious about it's stability though.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|