katto |
12-18-2010 12:49 PM |
I tried running wxHexEditor on an Ubuntu 10.4 live cd but it gave me errors. I then tried to compile it from source but I couldn't find a configure file. I tried the same thing on a netbook running a distro based on ubuntu 9.04 and I had the same results. Did anybody else try to run it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by syg00
(Post 4195485)
I had a look at LDE years ago.
Seems people tend to write what they need at the time, then lose interest in maintaining it. No fun in that for a hacker mentality.
|
It's a shame really. At least it's open source so maybe someone someday will take over.
Quote:
Originally Posted by allend
(Post 4195522)
I think the term you want is "sector editor" rather than "hex editor".
Linux has perfectly good hex editors e.g. okular in a GUI, bpe at the command line
|
Yes maybe sector editor is the correct term. Also disk editor but search results point mainly to DOS/win progs which aren't really what I'm looking for anymore. There were a couple of linux ones too though. By the way, how do you use okular as a hex editor? Do you mean putting some binary output through okular for viewing? That would work as a hex "viewer" I guess but calling it an editor would be a bit of a stretch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by allend
(Post 4195522)
The issue that the writer of wxhexeditor highlights is the lack of large file size support. What is not understood is that within Linux it is easy to extract the region of interest into a small file and work on that, then put that segment back.
The dd command is your friend.
There is no need to work directly with large files.
|
The writer also wants beautiful GUI's (can't argue with personal preference) and doesn't really care about CLI editors. If he went to the trouble of writing a new one altogether you can safely say that linux didn't have any good editors to use or even fork and then use. I worship dd and I don't mind a bare bones approach like what you suggest in principle but in this case it would just introduce unneeded steps in the process that in turn could lead to errors. Plus I'm busy as it is and I need the 'luxury' of a full-feature editor just to save time. You know how it is.
|