BW-userx |
02-23-2016 07:35 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delusion of Adequacy
(Post 5505144)
I can see why they did this; otherwise anyone with access to the computer and a little knowledge of linux could easily use root to change the password and gain access. That's the trouble with encryption: it's either convenient and user friendly, or as safe as possible. Never both.
|
yeah I too can see it with distros like mint or Ubuntututu that give a user a backdoor to root, because they do not actually give the user a front door. so the backdoor no password needed for root is what they have to use instead. because you cannot actually get rid of root
that is more a security issue then allowing a user to put a root user password in, and creating a actual root user account.
that too is another reason I stay away from distros that do not give the user a root account. It is a necessity.
one can just switch tty's and they still have to know the root passwd to get in. but them that do,are mostly the person that owns it and is acutally the root user with another user account. that is the way it should be.
then he can do as he did change passwords. being that it was an actual root account that it'd be done in. Then I wonder if that sync would have still failed? because it was not done in an passwordless root shell crap that any one can use.
|