Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
10-28-2004, 11:20 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada!
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 170
Rep:
|
Good Telnet Client for FC2?
Can someone recommend a good telnet program for FC2? I'm totally new to the interface, but I run a Linux BBS and I need a telnet client that supports proper ANSI menus and preferably has file transfer capability (yes, I know file transfer isn't part of the telnet realm).
It's possible that I have one installed....I haven't gone through every single menu item yet and man there's a lot of them. I'm telnetting from the console right now, but it doesn't handle ANSI well and I don't see that as an emulation option in setup.
Thanks!
Jon
|
|
|
10-29-2004, 05:42 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, LFS, Ubuntu, RedHat, Slamd64
Posts: 507
Rep:
|
You should try to use ssh rather than telnet, it's more secure.
Though, I don't know about your other issues.
John
|
|
|
10-29-2004, 07:29 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada!
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 170
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by jkobrien
You should try to use ssh rather than telnet, it's more secure.
Though, I don't know about your other issues.
John
|
Totally unhelpful and doesn't answer my question.
|
|
|
10-29-2004, 07:33 AM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417
|
Quote:
Originally posted by heatsink
Totally unhelpful and doesn't answer my question.
|
Maybe not, but it was polite and well intentioned (and correct) so being rude in return is not appreciated.
|
|
|
10-29-2004, 02:03 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada!
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 170
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by acid_kewpie
Maybe not, but it was polite and well intentioned (and correct) so being rude in return is not appreciated.
|
I wasn't being rude, just pointing out that the post served no purpose. I don't subscribe to the school of thought that 'any noise is better than no noise'.
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 05:22 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, LFS, Ubuntu, RedHat, Slamd64
Posts: 507
Rep:
|
You were rude. If you asked someone for directions, and if he didn't know, said he didn't know, but pointed out something that might be useful (your tail light is out), would you reply like that?
John
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 07:25 AM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada!
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 170
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by jkobrien
You were rude. If you asked someone for directions, and if he didn't know, said he didn't know, but pointed out something that might be useful (your tail light is out), would you reply like that?
John
|
No, because that's actually useful information and not just noise.
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 07:28 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada!
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 170
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Linux Telnet Client?
The other thread I started on this has degraded into stupidity, so I thought I would start a new one in the hopes that it will actually serve its purpose.
What's everyone using for a telnet client out there? I'm running FC2 and am currently using the plain old cli telnet client, but it doesn't support ANSI. Since I run a Linux BBS, I really need 'proper' ANSI support for my menus.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Jon
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 09:44 AM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Debian Etch
Posts: 179
Rep:
|
PuTTY
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 11:42 AM
|
#10
|
Moderator
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
|
Actually, jkobrien's advice was good. Telnet is very insecure, as far as I remember it's because you are sending everything in plaintext. Ssh is secure and is recommended over telnet by security professionals.
If, however, you insist on using telnet (and the telnet on your system is not good enough), have you looked at minicom? It is probably included on your system. Or try PuTTY - I believe that there is a Linux version.
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 12:26 PM
|
#11
|
Moderator
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
|
Re: Linux Telnet Client?
Quote:
Originally posted by heatsink
The other thread I started on this has degraded into stupidity, so I thought I would start a new one in the hopes that it will actually serve its purpose.
|
You are STILL being rude.
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 02:43 PM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Perry, Iowa
Distribution: Mepis , Debian
Posts: 2,692
Rep:
|
merging the two.
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 04:08 PM
|
#13
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada!
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 170
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by rshaw
merging the two.
|
Curses! Foiled.....
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 04:13 PM
|
#14
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada!
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 170
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by XavierP
Actually, jkobrien's advice was good. Telnet is very insecure, as far as I remember it's because you are sending everything in plaintext. Ssh is secure and is recommended over telnet by security professionals.
If, however, you insist on using telnet (and the telnet on your system is not good enough), have you looked at minicom? It is probably included on your system. Or try PuTTY - I believe that there is a Linux version.
|
No question it's not as secure as SSH - I agree. However, since I'm running a BBS - I keep both my telnet and ssh ports open so people can take their pick. I run the BBS as open as possible so that means offering as many types of connection options as possible. In addition to both my telnet and ssh ports being open, I've built a web interface for some of the message bases and the file areas.
I must admit I just assumed that any good telnet client would come with the SSH option, hence I suppose I'm not actually asking specifically for a telnet client per se.
Minicom..cool..never heard of it thanks. And it never occured to me that Putty would have a Linux version....
Thanks!
Jon
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 04:14 PM
|
#15
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada!
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 170
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by McCloud
PuTTY
|
Thanks!
Please don't post such long messages....hard on my eyes 
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|