LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Linux - Software (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/)
-   -   link using libuClibc-0.9.20.so library (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/link-using-libuclibc-0-9-20-so-library-338677/)

nignogeta 06-30-2005 06:27 AM

link using libuClibc-0.9.20.so library
 
Hi, i have a problem with compile a simple program in a machine an execute it on an other. I'm not a linux expert so i try to illustrate my situation.

I have 2 system with the same version of linux kernel 2.4.19.
I need to compile the simple code on the first machine and then run on the other because the second system is a very reduced installation (it is on a flash ramdisk).
I compile the code on the first machine with : "gcc source.c -lm -o source.o"
and when i use ldd cmd i obtain this:

libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4001b000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40038000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)

Version information:
./test_time.out:
libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.0) => /lib/libc.so.6
libm.so.6 (GLIBC_2.0) => /lib/libm.so.6
/lib/libm.so.6:
libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.0) => /lib/libc.so.6
/lib/libc.so.6:
ld-linux.so.2 (GLIBC_2.1.1) => /lib/ld-linux.so.2
ld-linux.so.2 (GLIBC_2.1) => /lib/ld-linux.so.2
ld-linux.so.2 (GLIBC_2.0) => /lib/ld-linux.so.2

Where ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-2.1.3.so
libc.so.6 -> libc-2.1.3.so
libm.so.6 -> libm-2.1.3.so

The executable file can't run in the second machine because it have only the 0.9.20.so library.

I tried the "-static" option with gcc and the program run but it work uncorrectly.

MY QUESTION IS: what is the best solution for this problem ? Compile the code using the 0.9.20 library or install the 2.1.3 on the secon system? Is possible to use cross-compiling ?

Thank in advance for any help


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 AM.