Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've to run a backup process, which *highly* loads the system, it makes a lot of disk i/o and I want to reduce it so that the entire system doesn't become unresponsive.
I've tried reducing the priority with the "nice" command but it doesn't work for me, because as far as I know, the kernel automatically increases priority to i/o processes.
That depends on your backup tool. I use rsync for backup to an external USB HD. One of the advantages of rsync is the ability to throttle the I/O rate. For example:
I was using DAR... but it is very, very, memory intensive when making entire hard disk differential backups.... so, I'm looking for another thing. Thanks for your suggestion.
Just a thought... Linux 2.6 offers a choice of four "I/O request schedulers" which can be assigned for disk I/O. These schedulers determine the order in which requests are handled and how the competing queues are balanced.
You may also find that an external "smart" disk-controller card will deliver considerably better performance under load than, say, the built-in IDE chains of a motherboard.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.